• @danc4498
        link
        English
        818 hours ago

        They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          618 hours ago

          NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.

          Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example

          • @danc4498
            link
            English
            118 hours ago

            Can Space X make the payloads?

            • @Cocodapuf
              link
              English
              312 hours ago

              Uh, basically no.

              NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.

              • @danc4498
                link
                English
                112 hours ago

                So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.

                • @Cocodapuf
                  link
                  English
                  311 hours ago

                  I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              416 hours ago

              SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.

              NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay