Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan warned that the Supreme Court’s decision in the Texas redistricting case will lead to a “violation of the Constitution” of voter rights.
The Supreme Court issued an unsigned decision in favor of freezing the initial 2-1 U.S. federal court ruling against Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s proposed redistricting map, a stay that could help Republicans pick up five additional U.S. House seats in next year’s midterms.
“This Court’s stay ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race,” Kagan wrote in her dissent. “And that result, as this Court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the Constitution.”
Using the constitution to run a nation of this size is like trying to run a modern data center with punch cards.
It needs to go because it’s not effective in curbing abuses, like this ruling shows.
It’s not the Constitution that’s the problem, the problem is the court that deliberately misinterprets it in the Republicans’ favor.
So the apply the same solution to the problem
And the Constitution gives them the final say on it.
Among many, many other problems with it.
Marbury v Madison set the precedent for judicial review; it isn’t in the constitution at all.
Another great example of why it sucks.
At this point it’s like using an Abacus.
An abacus made out of racism
So what happens after getting rid of the constitution?
I don’t know because clearly there can never be another one