@Nightwingdragon to politics English • 1 year agoProPublica report offers broadest look yet at Clarence Thomas' luxury travel bankrolled by wealthy friends reveals private jet and helicopter rides and VIP sporting event tickets | CNN Politicswww.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square70arrow-up1909arrow-down116
arrow-up1893arrow-down1external-linkProPublica report offers broadest look yet at Clarence Thomas' luxury travel bankrolled by wealthy friends reveals private jet and helicopter rides and VIP sporting event tickets | CNN Politicswww.cnn.com@Nightwingdragon to politics English • 1 year agomessage-square70
minus-square@givesomefuckslinkEnglish62•1 year agoIt’s important to remember that not a single justice said the SC needs oversight for this stuff… There’s clearly an issue, but none of them will admit because to them the optics of the court being corrupt is worse than the court being corrupt. The whole system needs redone.
minus-square@BeMoreCarefullinkEnglish12•1 year agoIn light of Citizens United, they are just being the change they want to see.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agohttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/03/supreme-court-ethics-elena-kagan/
minus-square@givesomefuckslinkEnglish-9•edit-21 year agoI don’t know what you thought that means… But it’s not her admitting the court has been corrupt for a long time
minus-square@givesomefuckslinkEnglish0•1 year agoQuote me the part where she admits the court is corrupt and needs oversight. I won’t wait tho, because she didn’t say it in your link. She just says they’re “looking into” people complaining it’s corrupt. No idea how you can’t tell the difference, guess I overestimated people again
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•edit-21 year agoNext time you wanna move the goalposts just do us all a favor and shove em firmly up your ass
minus-square@givesomefuckslinkEnglish-1•1 year agoWell, at least we know what half of you’re username is accurate… Not sure why you made that comment yesterday, deleted it, and made it again today tho. But Lemmy has a block button for this exact scenario…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoApp I’m using is funky, didn’t realize it posted yesterday. Toodles!
It’s important to remember that not a single justice said the SC needs oversight for this stuff…
There’s clearly an issue, but none of them will admit because to them the optics of the court being corrupt is worse than the court being corrupt.
The whole system needs redone.
In light of Citizens United, they are just being the change they want to see.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/03/supreme-court-ethics-elena-kagan/
I don’t know what you thought that means…
But it’s not her admitting the court has been corrupt for a long time
Removed by mod
Quote me the part where she admits the court is corrupt and needs oversight.
I won’t wait tho, because she didn’t say it in your link.
She just says they’re “looking into” people complaining it’s corrupt.
No idea how you can’t tell the difference, guess I overestimated people again
Next time you wanna move the goalposts just do us all a favor and shove em firmly up your ass
Well, at least we know what half of you’re username is accurate…
Not sure why you made that comment yesterday, deleted it, and made it again today tho.
But Lemmy has a block button for this exact scenario…
App I’m using is funky, didn’t realize it posted yesterday. Toodles!