• @bouh
    link
    English
    421 year ago

    That’s always the excuse they make. But it’s highly flawed. You can tax the planes that land in your country. They can’t evade landing in your country, and they don’t get to decide where people want to go.

    Either they are complete hypocrites or they are the most useless idiots when it comes to finding solutions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I would add a third option there: the aviation lobby is too strong, sufficiently suppressing the urge to find solutions. ;)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I think the issue is solvable for continental flights, but it becomes really difficult for international flights. At least not unless you get others to also support it, for which many sadly wont have any incentive.

      Want to tax the whole distance rather than just the portion flown within the airspace you control (which will be minimized as much as possible)? Airlines will split up long distance flights by utilizing airport hubs just outside your jurisdiction. Giving those a major advantage and moving a substantial business away.

      Combat this by taxing on an airline level? Airlines will just split into two entities, one serving europe and the other the rest of the world. Again leading to a loss for your economy. And at least for long international distances there is no alternative to flying.

      • @what_is_a_name
        link
        English
        141 year ago

        Sweden just taxes you upon landing. Sure some airlines left and some only fly short connect flights. But those are not easy fixes especially if all of EU was doing this.