Last week, a person with the Twitter handle @arizonasunblock from Tampa, Florida, noticed that Bradley, who has been on the high court since 2015, appeared to make major changes to her Wikipedia biography earlier this year.

  • @MicroWaveOP
    link
    170
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      125
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “It’s so unfair that my own words can be written down for posterity!”

      Tell me she doesn’t know that just because you’ve edited a Wikipedia page, that the previous version still exists, and is likely to draw attention and discussion because of your edits.

      • Silverseren
        link
        fedilink
        482 years ago

        And is super easy to revert to the prior version too. It’s basically two clicks to make it happen. And then have an admin protect the page to only allow established editors so randos can’t do this with just an IP address again.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Just in case she happened to read my comment, I didn’t want to use the word “revert” in order to avoid confusion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I love too that she mentioned, “REAL OPINIONS” as if those are more valid than the exact words she said.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It said “Actual Opinion” not “Real Opinions”.

          I’m pretty sure opinion doesn’t mean what you think it does. When a judge writes up an opinion it’s a bit stronger than me saying what I do or don’t like or how I feel about something. Same as between scientific theory and the other definition.

        • @grue
          link
          52 years ago

          Her judicial opinions are the exact words she wrote, though.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          72 years ago

          Thomas and that other guy in florida that helped craft the new educational standards with comments like “[slaves] learned new skills they could use for personal gain…” make me wonder why the hell america hasn’t already collapsed in on itself already

          • Blakerboy777
            link
            fedilink
            -12 years ago

            I can’t comment on the use of “Uncle Tom” specifically.

            But we ought not to use insults like that ever. By using them on people who “deserve it”, we are basically saying these terrible things are true, but we usually don’t say them because it’s rude. A better way to think is that we don’t use discriminatory insults/slurs because the hatred they represent is completely without merit.

        • @grue
          link
          22 years ago

          because I thought I would get banned

          Luckily, this isn’t Reddit.

            • @grue
              link
              5
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Yeah, but not necessarily for the same disregarding-of-context enlightened-centrist enforcing-of-“civility” bullshit that Reddit banned people for.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        22 years ago

        It’s an inaccurate epithet anyhow. Uncle Tom was overly nice to whites so as not to draw their wrath.

        In the end, the whites beat Uncle Tom to death when he refused to give the whereabouts of two runaway slaves.

        I don’t know what epithet you’d call someone who turned in the two slaves and lived to work the big house another day, but that’s what you should call Clarence.

        I used to call Clarence an Uncle Tom, but then I read the book.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            As someone who also read the book and was shocked that Tom wasn’t the minstrel show Tom that really earned the name: this weird effort to take back his name is self defeating and artificial.

            It says quite a lot that people also try to say “Maybe we should call them Uncle Ruckuses instead!”

            Mainly, it says they’re not clued in enough to realize the show/comic had two Uncle Toms. One had Uncle in his name, the other Tom.

            MacGruder wasn’t being very subtle, and yet everyone seems to have missed it anyways.

            Hell, if nothing else this whole weird idea is erasure of the minstrel shows. If you want to raise some actual awareness then feel free to separate Book Tom from Minstrel Tom, because we need to remember both.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          I don’t think that’s a racial slur my guy, a dictionary indicates it’s slang for female genitalia.

          • @techt
            link
            62 years ago

            I believe they’re referring to the use of Uncle Thomas, which while perhaps semantically appropriate is definitely a racially charged moniker.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              There’s a pretty big difference from a racial slur and a racial moniker that is only acceptable for people of that race to use as an accusation of betraying the community.

      • Evie
        link
        12 years ago

        Right!! They never got no treddfiddy neither for us!! Lol