Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:

We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world’s users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.

This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

  • @lwadminOPMA
    link
    5710 months ago

    Sure. But we’re a group of volunteers and we would not like to find out the hard way what is possible and what not. We would think meta discussions about piracy should be allowed as long as there is no linking to actual illegal content.
    But is pointing to locations with illegal content legal or not? And having members/admins worldwide it makes it even harder to be sure.

    We don’t want to find out the hard way and this is a better safe than sorry measure. Again we personally have nothing against the people on these communities or against the communities itself.

    • @xXxBigJeffreyxXx
      link
      English
      4010 months ago

      should go ahead and ban image uploading to lemmy.world, as there is likely a ton of illegal, copyright-violating content that hasn’t been stress-tested for fair use.

      • @NOT_RICK
        link
        English
        3210 months ago

        The music community could be an issue for the same reason, this logic is problematic

    • @CaptainEffort
      link
      1110 months ago

      Smart, might as well shut down this whole thread then as we’re discussing piracy here too, right?

      • kratoz29
        link
        English
        610 months ago

        I love Piracy!

    • @ladicius
      link
      -210 months ago

      I support your decision. Want to see the new instances that will pop up now hosted by your critics 😄

      • @MajorHavoc
        link
        110 months ago

        Yeah. Talk is cheap. Running a server is hard work.

    • @Zuberi
      link
      -1310 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • @snake
      link
      -7110 months ago

      Did you ever consider ceding ownership of the instance to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

      In the end, it will not make sense to try to keep this instance running if the owners are unable to provide adequate service to its users.

      • @assassin_aragorn
        link
        5910 months ago

        to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

        Someone who has the necessary legal capabilities is going to be a corporation. And that’s exactly why we left Reddit.

        • @void_wanderer
          link
          -210 months ago

          No. In Germany we have something called gGmbH. It’s basically a non-profit Limited. But IANAL, no idea if and how this would be able to protect the admins.

          • @Tenthrow
            link
            710 months ago

            So this nonprofit is going to run the largest Lemmy instance?

            • @void_wanderer
              link
              -210 months ago

              I don’t see any reason why it couldn’t.

              • @Tenthrow
                link
                English
                710 months ago

                I guess I don’t see any reason why it would.

                • @void_wanderer
                  link
                  010 months ago

                  Why wouldn’t it work? It’s just being a legal entity that rents the servers and hosts the instance, instead of a naturla person.

          • @sfantu
            link
            114 days ago

            Lololo

            That’s a corporation imbecile

            EVERYONE HAS THEM !

            LOLOLOLOLO

            Let me tell you a secret … THE GOVERNMENT is a corporation … the church… IS A corporation …

            Lolololololo

      • @Zak
        link
        2910 months ago

        Did you ever consider ceding ownership of the instance to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

        Is there such an entity with compatible goals that’s offering to take ownership?

      • @sab
        link
        10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yikes. Bit trigger happy with the ban hammer there. It’s at -40, isn’t that filtering enough?

        Edit: it was an instance ban initially, this is more reasonable.

        • @Weslee
          link
          310 months ago

          Eesh if posting a slightly hurtful comment is enough to get an entire instance ban… I wasn’t going to move home instance just because of those communities but the bans is way more of an eye opener.