Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:

We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world’s users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.

This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

  • @snake
    link
    -711 year ago

    Did you ever consider ceding ownership of the instance to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

    In the end, it will not make sense to try to keep this instance running if the owners are unable to provide adequate service to its users.

    • @assassin_aragorn
      link
      591 year ago

      to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

      Someone who has the necessary legal capabilities is going to be a corporation. And that’s exactly why we left Reddit.

      • @void_wanderer
        link
        -21 year ago

        No. In Germany we have something called gGmbH. It’s basically a non-profit Limited. But IANAL, no idea if and how this would be able to protect the admins.

        • @Tenthrow
          link
          71 year ago

          So this nonprofit is going to run the largest Lemmy instance?

            • @Tenthrow
              link
              English
              71 year ago

              I guess I don’t see any reason why it would.

              • @void_wanderer
                link
                01 year ago

                Why wouldn’t it work? It’s just being a legal entity that rents the servers and hosts the instance, instead of a naturla person.

        • @sfantu
          link
          16 months ago

          Lololo

          That’s a corporation imbecile

          EVERYONE HAS THEM !

          LOLOLOLOLO

          Let me tell you a secret … THE GOVERNMENT is a corporation … the church… IS A corporation …

          Lolololololo

    • @Zak
      link
      291 year ago

      Did you ever consider ceding ownership of the instance to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

      Is there such an entity with compatible goals that’s offering to take ownership?

    • @sab
      link
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yikes. Bit trigger happy with the ban hammer there. It’s at -40, isn’t that filtering enough?

      Edit: it was an instance ban initially, this is more reasonable.

      • @Weslee
        link
        31 year ago

        Eesh if posting a slightly hurtful comment is enough to get an entire instance ban… I wasn’t going to move home instance just because of those communities but the bans is way more of an eye opener.