Today’s players finish their points from way back

  • CannedYeet
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Of the four big tournaments, Wimbledon is the only one on grass. The French open is played on clay. The US and Australian Open are played on your typical hard court.

    • papalonian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I see, is there a big learning curve or difference when it comes to playing on grass vs a hard court? Like if a professional athlete has a tournament at Wimbledon, and they’ve only ever played on hard courts, would they be at a significant disadvantage to someone who played on grass? Or is it likely that both players will either have no experience with grass, or decent training in both?

      • SkunkWorkz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes some players play better on a specific surface. Like Nadal was a clay expert, since he is from Spain and Spain doesn’t have many grass courts, most outdoor courts there are clay courts. He has won 14 French Open titles while only 2 Wimbledon titles.

        Though to be fair grass courts are rare everywhere since they are expensive to maintain but they are even rarer in warm and dry countries like Spain

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          Are most outdoor courts clay courts? Or just the ones at a high enough level? It seems to me like hard courts are probably cheaper and require little to no maintenance. I would assume that the majority of courts are probably the low-maintenance variety.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There are differences that lead to advantages. If I remember correctly then Nadal was especially good in Paris while Murray was good in Wimbledon.