• Lemmayng
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        8 days ago

        Correct.

        Doesn’t make the slap in the face sting any less for Hall voicing a character that goes against everything she believes. But I guess that’s the beauty of acting: embodying a character that’s nothing like you and being compelling enough to make the audience believe you are the character.

        • _stranger_
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Right, but we can talk about the character without giving two fucks about the voice actor. She did a good job, it’s sad she’s dead to me now, moving on.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Jenna Fischer had a great line to sop the The Office Jim&Pam shippers who wanted the romance to be “real.”

            “The part of me the is Pam will always love the part of John that is Jim.”

            Which I just love as a way of potentially saying she can’t stand the guy.

          • Apepollo11
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Sorry, but this is bad form.

            The onus of proof is on you proving she’s MAGA, not on her proving she’s not.

            To do something like this, something she will likely never see, and say that you’ll take it down if she proves your theory otherwise, is unfair.

            Kudos for the seamless edit, but it’s not a cool thing to do.

            • tetris11@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              There is impetus to the proof that she is MAGA though (Charlie Kirk fan), and the silence around condemning an obviously fascist movement like MAGA is someone damning. I’d argue that the ball is very much in her court if she wishes to alter public perception of herself

              • Apepollo11
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                All that following Charlie Kirk proves is that she clicked a button once. Literally that’s the sum total of the evidence.

                It’s entirely possible that she’s not even aware of what her “public perception” from a few internet oddbods even is.

                Look, I’ve been called MAGA in the past and I:

                • A: Am British
                • B: Have literally been on a march to protest Parliament’s decision not to ban Donald Trump from the UK (back in 2016)
                • C: Would rather pay 100% tax than have a system that allows billionaires to exist

                The internet is full of people who are eager to assume the worst about people. The world is horrible enough - if this woman hasn’t actually done or said anything bad, then let’s leave her be.

                  • Apepollo11
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    Sorry, no can do. I’ve never had an Instagram account, a Facebook account, a Bluesky account, a Snapchat account or anything like that.

                    My entire social media presence is/was a Twitter account that I abandoned even before Elon Musk bought it (because Twitter was turning into a tyre fire even back then), a Reddit account that I abandoned during the great exodus, and a YouTube account that I posted a single video on in 2012. And this, of course.

                    Also… Are you genuinely using the fact that someone uses Google as evidence that they’re a bad person?