Guidelines on Diet Coke ingredient from consultants tied to alleged industry front group an ‘obvious conflict of interest’, report says

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

  • @rbhfd
    5•1 year ago

    How is the WHO affected by the 2 party system?

      • @[email protected]
        0•1 year ago

        Do you actually expect anything useful from searching for “how does the 2-party system affect the WHO”?

        Or do you expect random people on the internet to read your comment and suddenly dedicate an hour to researching your claim? If so, i admire your optimism.