The families of US soldiers who have died in the US-Israeli war against Iran are battling to ensure they receive appropriate pay and benefits for their loved ones.

Libby Klinner, a widow, wrote on social media that the US air force had deemed her ineligible for additional benefits following the death of Major Alex Klinner, her 33-year-old husband, because Congress had not officially declared war.

He was one of six crew members of a KC-135 refuelling aircraft that crashed in western Iraq in March while supporting US strikes against Iran.

  • givesomefucks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    Congress can basically make “non wars” into wars for benefits.

    OEF and OIF cover post 9/11 up to like 2010 in most of the middle east.

    It could be fixed right now, but trump and the Republicans won’t.

    But the real solution has always been giving everyone the benefits disabled vets get

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      they don’t even have the money for payroll right now.

      So no, they really can’t fix it overnight.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        But we can build ballrooms and arches and multiple attempts at a blue pool. Odd.

        • 13igTyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Because the other person is wrong. The US budget is basically a guideline and any excess gets carried to the next year.

        • DMCMNFIBFFF
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Better that than benefits to mass murderers that is the US military in Iran (and Iraq and Afghanistan and Vietnam …,).

      • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lol please. This president has proven he can do basically whatever he wants with allocated funds and neither Congress or scotus will stop him.

      • givesomefucks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Because Republicans have both majorities and the presidency…

        Our system sucks, but it used to be functional, and can be again.

        Obviously one of the first things to do once it’s functional, is improve the system and put in protections to stop this from happening again.

        Like, everyone complains about the electoral college, but we could just get rid of it and make the presidency a straight popular vote. But the real problem, is a president was never meant to have this much power in the first place. They’re supposed to be an essentially powerless ambassador.

        No real power, just the person we said can speak on our behalf in situations where there’s just a single seat at a table for America

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          one of the first things to do once it’s functional, is improve the system and put in protections to stop this from happening again.

          Agreed, that will be critical in trying to regain any level of trust from the rest of the world.

          the real problem, is a president was never meant to have this much power in the first place.

          Again, you have identified another of the issues that needs fixing.

           

          Between fixing those issues and repairing all the damage Trump (and his acomplices) have done, the USA has decades of work to do.

          I hope they are both willing and able to put in the effort.

          • givesomefucks
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Between fixing those issues and repairing all the damage Trump (and his acomplices) have done, the USA has decades of work to do.

            If you think that, you need to look back on how fast FDR fixed shit, and how the only thing that stopped him from doing more, is people not following up by flushing incumbents holding back progress.

            Back then the average person didn’t have the same outreach. Social media means people can actually organize and hear how things are going. That’s why oligarchs keep gobbling up social media and flooding it with bots.

            They’re fucking scared.

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Remind me in 6 years.

              Based on the level of apathy I see from a majority of Americans, I don’t expect much more than surface level changes (re-naming things back to their original names, de-trumping the white house decore etc) and little else.

              I also don’t trust that the Americans won’t just elect another complete asshole 4 years after Trump is no longer president.

              • givesomefucks
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Then you don’t understand how bad the party was under neoliberalism from 1991-2025, and you just assume that was actually trying or that the party went in a different direction with the 2025 chair election.

                Like, if you ignore everything, obviously it’s not going to make sense.

                If you pay attention to what happened and what is happening, you wouldn’t spend your free time shitting on the best and only chance to save the country…

                Unless you were a trump supporter or neoliberal despite to depress dem turnout to stop progressives

                • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  despite to depress dem turnout to stop progressives

                  I assume that was supposed to be “desperate”.

                  That aside, I would much prefer the Americans elect a Democrat over a Republican, but I also would prefer the democrats put forward more progressive candidates than they have been.

                  • givesomefucks
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    but I also would prefer the democrats put forward more progressive candidates

                    Buddy…

                    Every comment you make, shows you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.

                    The party shouldn’t pick any candidate, the fact that they were was the problem.

                    Why the fuck don’t you ask questions instead of a constant string of wrong information?

                    Do you think any of the shit you e been saying is actually true or how any of this works?