• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    The two are compared because money is not infinite and there’s an opportunity cost to picking either one

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      It’s Dubai we’re talking about here, money is infinite as far as they’re concerned. The alternative to nuclear for a baseline will always be fossil fuels until we can store the surplus of renewables efficiently, which is arguably further away than SMRs.

      • @Shanedino
        link
        51 year ago

        There has been some cool innovation in renewable energy storage such as pairing it with hydro and pumping water back up using access electricity during peak production.

        • @Wooki
          link
          11 year ago

          I love these fiction land scenarios that magically change the landscape.

          • @Shanedino
            link
            21 year ago

            Woah there I’m just saying it’s cool not that I think it’ll save the world or anything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          The innovation is there but it’s not viable yet for a country, or even city wide grid. Hydro is okay but severely limited by geography, rocks up a mountain could work too but it’s also limited by geography to some extent.