• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -311 year ago

    Someone needs to build and rehab rental houses and put up with tenants. No one is going to do that for free.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -241 year ago

        Without profit, you’re asking for them to sell their labor and expertise for free. Profit is the compensation people gain for the risk of making an investment, for the time and expense of doing what is necessary to manage and actualize that investment, and their expertise in knowing how to do so properly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          241 year ago

          Well, expertise is a very, very generous term to use for landlords in any way, shape, or form. And let’s be real, for how much profit they make off of the labor of other people, them having to break a nail wouldn’t kill anybody.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -161 year ago

            Depends on what they’re doing. Rehabbing a house that has been trashed or abandoned and doing so in a safe and efficient manner takes work and expertise.

          • @Maalus
            link
            -251 year ago

            Have you ever been a landlord? It feels like you haven’t, and are just repeating buzzwords like “they dont work but get money!”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. The state
      2. The state.
      3. Not for free, but the state.

      Just like social housing. But for everyne.

      If you want to own a home, buy it from the state.

      If you can’t afford it, rent it from the state.

      If you want to buy it, but can’t afford it, do the bank thing, but with the state.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -81 year ago

        Yeah, uh huh, okay. So go do that if you really think you can come up with public housing that isn’t a fucking nightmare. And if you think you can get it passed. Until then, the rest of us have to live in the real world.

        • @aesthelete
          link
          51 year ago

          Yeah, uh huh, okay. So go do that if you really think you can come up with public housing that isn’t a fucking nightmare.

          The FHA is already involved with lots of real estate transactions. The VA already provides some of the best loans in the country to military personnel. Just because you cannot envision the state being involved in housing without it turning into housing testaments from USSR doesn’t mean it’s not possible.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            Yep, and the great thing is that people have other choices, too. I’ve got no problem with FHA, VA, USDA loans.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            You want the state to have a monopoly on rental housing and the sale of houses. That’s what I read.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              That’s correct. How is this “social housing nightmare”? Instead of the bank owning your house, the state will.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -51 year ago

                Sounds awful. I don’t want ownership of my house to be exposed to malicious politicians and underfunded, incompetent bureaucrats following Byzantine regulations.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -51 year ago

                    Not really. We are in a best of both worlds situation here, with government credit backing competitive private loans.