• @severien
    link
    181 year ago

    It’s a problem for people who indebted themselves to buy those homes with a valuation based on scarcity. Also a problem for the real estate Chinese companies, sector which represents a quarter of Chinese economy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      people who indebted themselves to buy those homes with a valuation based on scarcity.

      Too… bad? That’s how investments work. They don’t always pan out to make you richer.

      Something tells me everyone investing in this can afford to take the hit. They’re just gonna be mad they can’t rip people off.

      • @severien
        link
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Something tells me everyone investing in this can afford to take the hit.

        There are millions of ordinary Chinese taking an expensive mortgage now owning an unfinished apartment in a ghost town. It will hit the poorest the hardest - they still have to pay the mortgage, but can’t even live in their apartments, because they are not finished.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      -4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sounds to me like China is trying to solve both of those problems by lowering property scarcity - if this stays controlled it will make properties cheaper so people don’t need to acquire as much debt and it will shrink the real estate sector. Since this housing is built through centralized control and not a market, it should be totally under control.

      Obviously something unexpected could happen that blindsides the Party, but it looks like politics is in command and everything is proceeding as expected.

      • @30mag
        link
        English
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          There should always be a reserve supply of vacant properties to give people freedom of movement between regions and cities.

          • @30mag
            link
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              -51 year ago

              That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house. Children move out all the time, families sometimes break up, Chinese citizens currently living overseas or in Europe return home, etc.

              I bet there’s actually math for this - I wonder if anyone has calculated the optimal amount of vacancies?

              • @30mag
                link
                English
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -31 year ago

                  I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

                  Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.

                  • @30mag
                    link
                    English
                    4
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    deleted by creator