• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    431 year ago

    I was so disappointed when Gaetz (almost forgot to include the name, have to be specific when talking about Republicans) wasn’t charged after all the venmo stuff came out. Like it seemed there was evidence that he should have at least been charged and had a trial. Unless I missed something else after that completely absolved him of ties with the sex trafficking guy who he was apparently buddy with.

    • 👽🍻👽
      link
      261 year ago

      Yeah that was obvious horseshit. The county employee he was in conspiracy with took the entire shaft for that. I’m curious as to what Gaetz promised that dude not to flip, because his corroboration was needed to bring the Venmo receipts and some of that other shit out of circumstantial and into real shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The issues are 3 fold:

        -His co-conspirator had a habit of making up lies about his enemies. He had serious credibility issues.

        -The 17 year old they both raped took a settlement and apparently refuses to testify againt him. I personally cant blame her for taking the money and running instead of becoming a target for her whole life, ala Lewinsky.

        -The DOJ is outright chicken shit. The rumor is that they are afraid to take him to trial because of the above and because of his status as a congressman/ties to trump.

        • @AngryCommieKender
          link
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Qualified Immunity is the root issue since it extends to all government workers, the elected officials as well as the officers and adminstrators, and the weirdest thing is that QI is actually illegal under the original wording of statute 1983 of The Federal Code. It just got illegally modified in 1874 by an archivist, and no one noticed until recently. If you look up section 1983 in The Congressional Record of 1871 it has 16 words that weren’t copied into The Federal Register in 1874. The modified law was what was presented to the 1982 SCOTUS in Harlow V Fitzgerald. They made a mistake, and even questioned why the 1871 Congress was so clear about everything except the clause that was removed illegally.