• A_Random_Idiot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why wait, do it now.

    I jumped ship to Linux when Win 7 died, cause I’d rather be fucked by a rusty fencepost than be forced to use 10, and 11 is right out.

    • TheGoldenGod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Looking to move an older Windows 7 laptop to Linux this week, any suggestions? Feels like there’s so much.

        • havokdj
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I agree with every point you make except for the desktop environment front end.

          While it is nice to install a distro with a given desktop environment OOTB, you can always change it, and even have multiple ones installed at the same time. This is typically a better approach to testing out desktop environments because you don’t have to reinstall every time.

      • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you just need a general purpose desktop and it’s your your first time, I would suggest just picking a popular and stable one with lots of documentation like Debian, Mint or Ubuntu.

      • Kyleand19
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Fedora saved my old Windows laptop and it was a pretty smooth switch from Windows for me (though I had a bit of Linux experience). That thing became quicker than when I first bought it haha.

      • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Choose a variation of Mint. They have a lighter weight build that is perfect for older hardware just read their site. Mint operates and feels extremely close to w7 and its easy to use! Promise you’ll like it

      • ozymandias117
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ignore all the “this distro is the best”

        Just use Ubuntu to start until you know what you wish was different

          • ozymandias117
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s what proprietary software tends to target, so for someone just coming from Windows, it’s a decent first choice.

            OpenSUSE/Fedora don’t support media codecs without knowing you need to add Packman/RPMFusion

            Debian just released Bookworm, so it might be an okay recommendation for now, but as a general rule it’s probably not the best first distro

            For someone used to Windows staying the same for years, jumping straight to a rolling release like Arch or its derivatives is a massive change

            NixOS is too much configuration for a first time user

            Linux Mint is maybe a better first recommendation, but it’s still downstream of Ubuntu (I wouldn’t recommend LMDE for a first time Linux user)

            Your response is exactly why people find it so difficult to pick a distro to start. Ubuntu may not be the perfect distro for you or I, but there’s a decent reason it’s one of the biggest, and it has conservative defaults

            Until that user knows what things bother them about it or what more they need, we’d just go back and forth all day about upsides and downsides of each distro

          • marx2k
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Linux does have desktop environments.

              • brakebreaker101
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                That’s a lot like how on windows you have to download a zip and open it to select an executable.

              • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                I think it depends on what you’re trying to do. Normal stuff like web browsing, email and working with documents is fine. For example, my partner has been running her business from a Linux laptop for the last year or so and I don’t think she ever touches the terminal.

              • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                It’s not that it’s unintuitive at all if you pick a simple distro, it’s just slightly different from Windows which has been shoved in your face throughout your entire education and career.

                Yes there is some small amount of learning involved, but there are many Linux distros nowadays that are setup for ease of use and require no CLI knowledge or use from the user. There are many desktop environments that mimic Windows versions to make the switch pretty seamless, too.

                If you first tried Linux many years ago, I could understand you saying that it’s unintuitive, but nowadays that just isn’t the case.

                I’d like to add that you should just pick the OS you prefer. I’m not one of those needs that look down on anyone who chooses to use Windows over Linux. I personally have both on my machine because games. I just wanted to clarify that it isn’t unintuitive at all, just different than what you were forced to learn in school.

                  • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    You don’t have to really use the CLI on the simpler Linux distros nowadays is what I am getting at. Mint and Ubuntu for instance. My grandparents use Mint, and believe me, they don’t know what the terminal is.

                    Also, windows installers run Command Prompt stuff in the background. You are basically doing the same process but clicking buttons to setup a CLI command. They are more similar than you think.

                    You are just used to the GUI way of doing things, and you can get by fine on Linux nowadays. If you were forced to learn Linux growing up, you would think Windows was the unintuitive OS.

                    I’m not trying to convince you one is better than the other, just telling you that it is not unintuitive.

      • SexyPolariton@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it depends, I guess you “just” need the right distro and compatible hardware (e.g. a Thinkpad). I started as a complete Linux noob too, but most problems I encountered I could easily solve in no time because a lot of things are nicely documented or someone else had them before and documented their solution on the internet. But depending on your usecase and other factors I understand Linux can be a pain in the ass.

      • dai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Mainstream distros are just as easy to use as windows or MacOS.

        • pascal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          As a Linux user I mostly agree…

          … until you try to play any competitive multiplayer game and wonder why any anticheat doesn’t work or flags your system and account.

          Nowadays I use my Windows 10 mostly for games and video editing.

          • dai
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            EAC depending on the title works out of the box from what I’ve seen, I don’t have much time these days to play many competitive shooters or games in general but Battlebit and PlanetSide look to work fine through proton.

          • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            You make a fair point. ProtonVPN was a nightmare for me to set up and get working too but I think that’s Proton’s fault more than Linux’s. I have many other applications that I simply installed with one click from the Software application and then have never needed to touch again. It seems not all app developers are equally motivated to make their stuff easy to run.

        • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          There’s still a lot of little things that are still a pain for someone who doesn’t know how things work. Many are not the OS’ fault but still, different experiences.

          For example, say you’re running discord. Next week there’s a discord update, it’ll not apply the update automatically, it’ll only download a deb file. An user familiar with windows may try to open the deb file… And it’ll launch the package manager, but the only option available is to uninstall. In order to install the update you’ll need the terminal.

          There are a lot of little things like this. This one is just something you need to learn, but others are a real pita when you have no experience.

          And if you have a 4k screen and Nvidia gpu when you try Linux for the first time, I guarantee you’re going to hate the experience.