• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    The west can not afford to let Ukraine be destroyed and taken over by Russia. It would set an incredibly dangerous precedent and it would send a certain message to all allies and everyone else that would destroy diplomatic standing of usa. The support usa gave is miniscule, mostly old weapons that they would have to pay do destroy anyway. Miniscule in regards their military budget, a budget that is huge exactly because of Russia and threats like it.

    • @luckyhunter
      link
      -91 year ago

      I agree, Europe can’t afford it. The US has contributed way more than necessary all ready, more than all other nations combined. We are literally paying peoples salary in Ukraine now. Enough is enough, Europe can take charge of their own back yard clean up now and will have to for at least the next month because the temporary funding bill that just passed in the US eliminated any further aid.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Like I said already, it’s mostly old weapons without any real value. USA has not contributed nearly enough. It was just breadcrumbs. Of course they have all the perogative to stop, but when you look at the economics of the situation, usa has no option but to continue and drastically increase funding for Ukraine. That is what is happening and will continue to happen until Ukraine is not occupied anymore and is protected enough against threats from Russia.

        The aid you speak of that was supposed to be eliminated is only an aid mechanism which was never used. The aid is coming in through other channels, usually directly through congress. In reality, nothing has changed and it’s likely this mechanism will also be soon reinstated to give Ukraine more options on the conditions it receives aid on.

        If you want to talk numbers, I think Ukraine will need at least half of the usa military budget to win this war and more to keep the Russian hordes at bay after the war. Europe can provide some of that, but where weapons are in question, that is more of a usa thing.

        If America wants to keep it’s status in the world, which provides enormous diplomatic and economic benefits, they have to step up when that is needed.

        • @luckyhunter
          link
          -51 year ago

          I’m tired of my tax dollars going to being world police. My tax dollars should go to my community not be used to fund a war half way around the world. If Ukraine would like to BUY military equipment from us then fantastic. I also hear the Taliban have a shit ton of our military equipment they might be looking to sell. The countries in Europe should have always been the first ones to step in with aid and contribute the largest amounts.

          If your claim is true that Ukraine still needs half of our military budget just to survive, then that sounds like a lost cause to me. Because they obviously can’t afford that, and it’s certainly not the US taxpayers job to fund it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            You may be tired, but then prepare to get completely exhausted. America is America because of its army and how that army is used. Your community is that, because of who and what americas army is. For better and for worse. Europe is how it is because of that also.

            In this situation it is the job of America and the west to defend Ukraine and it is the moral imperitive for the west to stand behind them and help with whatever we can. That is the only option. The only option. If we don’t do it, the consequences may be dire, but it is also the right thing to do. America should and will increase the funding. My estimates are half of the budget for one year. That money is a negligible percentage of all the money that was spent in history to bring Russia to it’s knees and no American soldiers lives.

            • @luckyhunter
              link
              -31 year ago

              Actually, if we want to assume hurting Russia is what’s best for America, then we need to trickle just enough material aid to keep Ukraine’s military from complete collapse and let the whole conflict grind on for a few decades. Just like what we did for Afghanistan in the 1980’s, the last thing we’d want is for Ukraine to win quickly.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                I’ve heard this talking point before, but it’s completely illogical. If you want to hurt Russia you give the other side everything they want and in great numbers and let them do whatever they want with it.

                • @luckyhunter
                  link
                  -11 year ago

                  It’s got a long track record of working great. It doesn’t matter what they say they want or need, what matters is what is best for the US? Even though I disagree with all of the aid we already have sent, have you noticed there is no serious calls for peace from any US leader? This plan is already in action.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    No and no. Best is what is best for Ukraine. There are many aspects to it not only one, of course each countries politicians have to look at it from different perspectives and wheigh the options with those in mind, but that doesn’t change what matters.

                    I have seen non stop calls for peace for all nations and leaders in the world. In not sure what media you follow, but calls for peace have been going on since before the war, since before the occupation of crimea. I’ve seen leaders go to see Putin and plead for peace. Putin has 0 interest in that unless he gets everything he wants, so he can start to prepare for next invasion.

          • @SCB
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You don’t pay enough in taxes to deserve a say.

            I know this because to be this dumb there’s no way you have a real job.

            • @luckyhunter
              link
              -11 year ago

              lucky for me, the US constitution says otherwise!

              • @SCB
                link
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It really doesn’t. You get a vote, but not a say.

                And, statistically, your vote isn’t impactful because you probably don’t live somewhere where it matters.

                Enjoy voting no on school levies or whatever though.

                • @luckyhunter
                  link
                  -11 year ago

                  I was obviously referring to the 1st amendment, but I absolutely am fully eligible to run for any federal elected office as well!

                  • @SCB
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    The first amendment does not give you a voice in our government, which is clearly what I meant.

                    But yes you can ramble here, because who else would I make fun of when I’m between meetings at work if dumb people didn’t post stupid shit on the internet?

                    Now, don’t you have some drywall to hang?