• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    What if you have an uneven number of belts because you take one or put one away? It would be very instable and would tilt without the same weight front and back.

    • @Noite_Etion
      link
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s my thoughts too.

      This is just a suggestion, not a knock or anything against the poster. But a solution I think could work is to rotate the hook 90 degrees and have 2 of them, one at each end. Then it would remain flat and balanced no matter where the belts are on the rack.

      Not a perfect solution, you wont see or have access to the belts at the back and the mount takes up more space on the rail. But at least you aren’t playing a balancing game each time you take a belt.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I think I’d hang the hook off the end, so that the belts are stored in a vertical tree (slightly sloped, so that they don’t fall over each other.) But that’s an entirely new redesign for something that only really matters if you care about it.

    • @thenewredOP
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      There’s a little bit of movement but it’s not too annoying. When loaded up with belts, taking one off doesn’t make a big difference.

      • @karlach
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @thenewredOP
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I can barely code fibonacci, doubt I could model it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Just leave the empty gap in the middle? Come on Sam, we’ve got to work together on stuff like this!

    • Meeech
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Buy a decoy belt that only gets used when you’re wearing one of the real belts. The decoy belt can get a wall mounted hook so it’s out of the way when no belts are being warn.