• @Omgarm
    link
    English
    26
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Nifty! But I only have 2 belts…

    • @thenewredOP
      link
      English
      389 months ago

      Clearly you need to buy more belts to fill out your new belt organizer

      • @alvvayson
        link
        English
        189 months ago

        And don’t forget to buy them in pairs so that the organizer remains balanced.

        • @Windswept
          link
          English
          79 months ago

          What happens when you wear one?

          • @alvvayson
            link
            English
            79 months ago

            Good point.

            Gotta wear them in pairs, for the balance, obviously.

            • @Stovetop
              link
              English
              59 months ago

              Tetsuya Nomura approves.

      • @RGB3x3
        link
        English
        49 months ago

        My wife bought me a 6-slot watch box last year when I only owned two watches…

        Obviously, I had to fill it up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    What if you have an uneven number of belts because you take one or put one away? It would be very instable and would tilt without the same weight front and back.

    • @Noite_Etion
      link
      English
      10
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s my thoughts too.

      This is just a suggestion, not a knock or anything against the poster. But a solution I think could work is to rotate the hook 90 degrees and have 2 of them, one at each end. Then it would remain flat and balanced no matter where the belts are on the rack.

      Not a perfect solution, you wont see or have access to the belts at the back and the mount takes up more space on the rail. But at least you aren’t playing a balancing game each time you take a belt.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        I think I’d hang the hook off the end, so that the belts are stored in a vertical tree (slightly sloped, so that they don’t fall over each other.) But that’s an entirely new redesign for something that only really matters if you care about it.

    • @thenewredOP
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      There’s a little bit of movement but it’s not too annoying. When loaded up with belts, taking one off doesn’t make a big difference.

      • @karlach
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @thenewredOP
          link
          English
          39 months ago

          I can barely code fibonacci, doubt I could model it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      Just leave the empty gap in the middle? Come on Sam, we’ve got to work together on stuff like this!

    • Meeech
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      Buy a decoy belt that only gets used when you’re wearing one of the real belts. The decoy belt can get a wall mounted hook so it’s out of the way when no belts are being warn.

    • @thenewredOP
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      My personal solution was to not own any. But I have thought about it. Maybe a slot on both ends of the body to slide the knob of the buckle into. That would allow for two belts pretty easily.

    • @NewNewAccount
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      Had to google this. Are these common? I personally think they’re not very good looking.

      • Uninvited Guest
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        Common? Not sure. They’re available at standard shops. I have had one for 20 years that I picked up in highschool from American Eagle for $34.50. Why is that etched in my brain? I was specifically looking for one at the time.

        I prefer the look (as long as it’s simple) and function.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    I bought a tie hanger with hooks. It lets me hang up my four belts and ~10 ties (that I’ve never worn again since the rona). I’m usually in sweat pants and hardly use my belts anymore now that I think about it. Anyway, I really like it. Think this would have more Utility and use less material with just hooks.

    Mine looks like this one

  • @uis
    link
    English
    2
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I would go with slopes instead of fillets, but nice anyway

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    I have one that I absolutely despise. It has only one job and it tosses my belts to the floor…on purpose.

  • @Fredselfish
    link
    English
    29 months ago

    Another reason for me to buy a 3d printer. Any tips on building one folks?

    • @TheTetrapod
      link
      English
      59 months ago

      Buy an ender 3 if you’re cheap and have plenty of tinker time. Buy something by Bambu if you have cash and want ease of use.

      • @Fredselfish
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        I’m more broke but want to get one anyway and I am between the technical and ease of use mode.

    • @thenewredOP
      link
      English
      39 months ago

      Try to go with something popular so you can find help when things inevitably go wrong. Expect to learn a lot when building. If you like that, awesome, do it. Otherwise you may want to consider a prebuilt prusa or bambu.

        • @thenewredOP
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          Ender, prusa, bambu are names that have popularity, longevity, and reputation.

          You can find a ton of recommendations and best printer lists with a quick search. You would probably be fine with most printers on those lists if you wanted to save some money, but the above three are solid and give you a good budget range already.

    • @grayman
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      How much money do you want to put into a setup? With $1000, you an get any of the really good printers, a different size nozzle, a few little tools, and plenty of filament.