Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib refused to apologize Wednesday for saying on Tuesday that Israel is to blame for the hospital explosion that day in Gaza, an accusation that sparked political backlash against her from Republicans as Israel denies fault.

Tlaib joined thousands of protesters calling for a ceasefire in Gaza during a solidarity rally hosted by the left-leaning group Jewish Voice for Peace at the National Mall. She was visibly emotional, at times pausing her speech to openly weep and criticizing lawmakers who have not backed a ceasefire resolution.

  • @PizzaMan
    link
    40
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Defense does not necessitate apartheid or ethnic cleansing.

      • @PizzaMan
        link
        31 year ago

        I never implied it did.

        You did, because you stated that:

        If Israel stopped fighting tomorrow, what do you think would happen?

        Implying that the only thing Israel is doing is fighting. It’s not, it’s doing a hell of a lot more than that. It’s doing apartheid and ethnic cleansing.

        If you’re saying that Israel should stop doing those things and instead only focus on defense then I agree with you. But you’re acting like Isreal is completely innocent.

        That’s not called “apartheid” anywhere else in the world, only when people are looking for a word to demonize Jews with.

        Yeah, that’s not true.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_apartheid

        The term was started in South Africa, being critical of the white people in charge.

          • @kaonashi
            link
            11 year ago

            What are Israel’s borders? It seems like it conveniently places its borders in one place when it wants to selectively disenfranchise 5 of the 7 millions Arabs, and another when it wants to place settlements.

              • Karyoplasma
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Have you heard of a country that didn’t have military court or military tribunals? Can you name such a country? Is the country in the room with us now?

                Whataboutism, but I’ll bite. No, I haven’t heard of a country that colonized inhabited land and unequally punished the people they oppressed and then didn’t need to concede that what they were doing was wrong. Weird how that epiphany always comes after the colonists get what they want tho. Hindsight is 20/20 I guess.

                Military courts are supposed to govern your armed forces, not any rando you don’t like.

                but of course Israel doesn’t use its intranational civilian courts to try Palestinians in Palestine, that wouldn’t make any sense.

                A Palestine state does not exist unless you equate Palestine to the Gaza prison camp guarded by Israel and maybe parts of the West Bank that Israel occupies against international law since I-don’t-even-know-how-long. A convenient excuse for their racist system.

                What it boils down to is that in a Zionist state, like the Likud strives for Israel to be, Jewish law only applies to Jews and not to the “gentile”.

            • @SoleInvictus
              link
              -11 year ago

              I always laugh when people fall over themselves trying to claim Israel isn’t an apartheid state. It’s basically matches the textbook definition of an apartheid state at this point. Even the many Israelis with a conscience call it out as an apartheid state. There’s no legitimate uncertainty there, only propaganda, lies, and ignorance.

                • @SoleInvictus
                  link
                  -11 year ago

                  Oh yeah, I love whataboutisms! They’re absolutely a valid way to… deflect from the topic actually being discussed.

                  • @Ya_Boy_Skinny_Penis
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Somebody doesn’t know what whataboutism is. I do love how you couldn’t answer the question though, proved my point very effectively

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox
      link
      -12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Defense does not necessitate apartheid or ethnic cleansing.

      Where exactly has Israel done this recently? Attacking someone across your border because they’re killing people near yours is war.

      See, Ukraine attacking places inside Russia lol. Justifiably so.

      • @PizzaMan
        link
        201 year ago

        Where exactly has Israel done this recently?

        They’ve been doing it for decades.

        https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution

        As for the more recent:

        https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/13/civilians-trapped-in-gaza-cant-escape-israels-siege.html

        Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, and religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making a region ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal, extermination, deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction.[3][4][5] It constitutes a crime against humanity and may also fall under the Genocide Convention, even as ethnic cleansing has no legal definition under international criminal law

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing

        Attacking someone across your border because they’re killing people near yours is war.

        Civilians are getting killed and forced out of their homes, all based on race. It’s an apartheid, and an ethnic cleansing.

        • Khalic
          link
          fedilink
          -5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The apartheid accusation is solid, nothing to say here.

          But ethnic cleansing?

          There are 2 million arab israeli citizens… not very homogenous. That’s almost 1 in 5 citizens.

          • @PizzaMan
            link
            71 year ago

            The degree to which a nation is homogeneous is not the qualifying factor for whether an action is considered ethnic cleansing. It is instead the effect, and the effect of forcing Palestinians out of their homes, out of Gaza, counts as ethnic cleansing.

            It’s also not just based on race, it’s also got to do with religion.

              • @PizzaMan
                link
                71 year ago

                Actually, the only thing you can really call “apartheid” in Israel…

                That’s not true.

                https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution

                You might complain about the property decisions from decades before that

                Yeah. Those decisions are exactly what people are talking about when people call it apartheid. And those decisions have never stopped, it’s been happening ever since the Israeli-Palistinian conflict started.

                When somebody comes in, says they own your home, and then try to kick you out because of your race/religion, that is apartheid.

                but the tenants agreed to the rent terms in the early 90s,

                “Agreed” is a strong word to use when the alternative is homelessness.

                so framing this as “ethnic cleansing” is pretty nuts.

                It is the intentional homogenization of a region, dispelling people from their homes that they’ve lived in since their birth. That is by definition ethnic cleansing.

                  • @SoleInvictus
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Man, someone here has been guzzling propaganda and ignoring tons of evidence, much of it on video, to the contrary. But yes, tell us more about how Israel’s many broken agreements to not expand colonists into Palestinian territory is “just protecting their border”.

      • @kaffiene
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Gaza is basically an open air prison. Do they control their own borders?