Jordan faux-fearlessness is the norm among the MAGA male set, of course. It’s why he’s become such a celebrity in right-wing media and a power player in the GOP. He’s a perfect avatar of the toxic masculinity of the 21st-century Republican: Loud talking, followed by fleeing at the first sign of a real challenge.

Donald Trump, of course, is the most prominent example. He uses social media near-daily to threaten his political and legal opponents while cringing from any real danger behind a phalanx of taxpayer-funded security. But this week, he made a pathetic effort to bring his phony tough guy act out in person. He returned to court in Manhattan on Tuesday for the ongoing trial to determine how much he’ll be punished for decades of fraud. He’s been absent for a couple of weeks, once it became clear that his presence wasn’t garnering the press coverage he craved. His return appears to have been an attempt at witness intimidation.

  • @TropicalDingdong
    link
    411 year ago

    I prefer the term “dickless chicken fuckers” but coward is close.

    • 18-24-61-B-17-17-4
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      How you gonna fuck a chicken without a dick? Let the chicken fuck you I guess? Still a chicken fucker at that point, technically.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        No no, its people who want to fuck chickens, a crazy and wanton act, but they lack the dick to do so, so they just run around like impotent idiots.

      • @agent_flounder
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        How? About the same way as they govern with a Republican majority.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Roosters are chickens too

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        11 year ago

        Roosters don’t have dicks. They manage to fertilize the chickens just the same

    • Flying Squid
      link
      51 year ago

      Honestly, “coward” would piss them and their sycophants off more. One is just an insult. The other has weight behind it.

      • @TropicalDingdong
        link
        31 year ago

        It’s not clear to me that “those people” have a sufficiently developed moral compass to have a functional sense of shame based on some kind of parliamentary proceedings. They’re able to write it off a “gobernment bad”.

        However, I do agree that embarrassment is an effective forcing function. I think we could move the needle if there was a way to physically embarrass these people in a public way. They need to be shamed but they have none. So it’s gotta go further. It needs to be an almost physical emotional response of embarrassment. The kind of thing that a person never forgets. I’m not sure what that is yet but I’m working towards it.