The chamber has been without a leader for weeks because of GOP infighting.

  • @randon31415
    link
    -911 months ago

    With this many running and no primary in the “republican secret conference ballot”, someone that has the support of 26 representatives (out of 438) could win the gavel.

    • @Jackcooper
      link
      1511 months ago

      If it was plurality then Jeffries would be the speaker

      • @randon31415
        link
        111 months ago

        I am talking about the nomination process, not the speaker vote.

    • insomniac_lemon
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I assume you think it’s FPtP rules but in this case an absolute majority (more than half) is needed, unless I’m missing something new? So more people running likely means less chance of a speaker being picked (and thus even more voting attempts).

      EDIT: Or do you mean that the secret ballot is plurality and that every republican will honor that result (even if they dislike who won) thus giving that pick the majority on the floor vote?

      Is the secret ballot how McCarthy won after 15 rounds of voting? Or are they going to work out a different deal now?

      • @randon31415
        link
        211 months ago

        Yes, the Republicans were passing around a " I will vote for whomever gets the most votes on the secret first ballot" pledge the other day. I was like: “So no primary, ranked choice, or multiple rounds of voting until a majority? Just the highest vote getter on the first round? What is the worst case on that?”

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          311 months ago

          Worst case is they have peeps not follow the oath and we go in for yet another week

          • @randon31415
            link
            111 months ago

            I’ve learnt from Trump that worst case in politics isn’t the “worst thing that could reasonably happen.”