• @sock
    link
    -11 year ago

    all humans are animals

    all dogs are animals

    therefore humans are dogs

    not a very good argument imo

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re doing all A are in C, all B are in C =⟩ A is in B, which makes no sense and isn’t what they said.

      They said all A are in B, all B are in C =⟩ A are in C, which is true by the transitive property.

      All humans are animals

      All animals are Pokemon

      Therefore all humans are Pokemon

    • @BugFinder
      link
      31 year ago

      That’s a poorly constructed argument though. How about,

      All animals are Pokémon.

      Humans are animals.

      Humans are Pokémon.

      • @sock
        link
        21 year ago

        yeah i easily would trade a family member for a reality where my childhood dog was alive.

        but maybe an extended family member im not sure.

    • @EvolvedTurtle
      link
      21 year ago

      All humans are animals All dogs are animals Not all animals are dogs Not animals are humans But all the animals in modern Pokemon are Pokemon So the question is Does animal == Pokemon If so human are Pokemon But if animal != Pokemon Then humans != Pokemon and human == animal