• @Torvum
    link
    English
    -31 year ago

    Because this loser mentality of “it needs killing”. Yeah it’s called the circle of life. I guess we morally shame owls for hunting the mice that hunted the insects. If you want to make a statement on factory farms and torturous methodology, that’s one thing. But death is a part of life, and having meaning in death to provide nutrition for continuation of life is just a reality.

    • @teuniac_
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      death is a part of life, and having meaning in death to provide nutrition for continuation of life is just a reality.

      You’re missing something pretty important here. Death is part of life is an argument that you’d use to try and justify hunting. Farming also means breeding more animals that will be raised for their meat and killed after a few years.

      Globally, 60% of all large mammals are livestock. It’s a crazy number and there is nothing natural about this. The killing isn’t the root problem, producing/breeding huge numbers of animals is.

      Death might be a natural part of the circle of life, but we’re artificially starting this circle for many farm animals. If we’d stop doing this at such an insane scale, we wouldn’t need to discuss their death (or quality of life)

      Importantly, this is something that we choose to do even though we don’t have to. The owl has to hunt for mice and isn’t able to choose not to. This makes our moral position not comparable to owls or any other animal.

    • @paultimate14
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      The only morally correct metabolism is photosynthesis

      • @Oderus
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        If only photons could talk. Imagine the harm they experience.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      shit man, guess treating disease is a mistake. Those bacteria need to grow in us after all. Sepsis is the cycle of liiiiiiife.