@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoOxygen.mander.xyzimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down120file-text
arrow-up1571arrow-down1imageOxygen.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square48fedilinkfile-text
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/54762/did-cyanobacteria-commit-evolutionary-suicide-by-producing-oxygen
minus-square@RizzRustboltlinkEnglish19•1 year agoNot only is our atmosphere made of rocket fuel, but our planet’s crust is made up of the most oxidizing substances in the universe. Our whole planet is a massive bomb waiting for the right trigger to set it off.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•1 year agoThe atmosphere is made of rocket oxidizer, not fuel. Fuel would be something that reacts with oxygen: Hydrogen, Methane, etc.
minus-squareLuxlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoFrom the pov of an organism in a high-oxygen atmosphere, thats true. But on a planet with little to no oxygen in the atmosphere, it would have to be added separately, the same way we add fuel
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoIt would change how you perceive the chemistry
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoThe electron acceptor would still be the oxidizer.
Not only is our atmosphere made of rocket fuel, but our planet’s crust is made up of the most oxidizing substances in the universe.
Our whole planet is a massive bomb waiting for the right trigger to set it off.
The atmosphere is made of rocket oxidizer, not fuel. Fuel would be something that reacts with oxygen: Hydrogen, Methane, etc.
From the pov of an organism in a high-oxygen atmosphere, thats true. But on a planet with little to no oxygen in the atmosphere, it would have to be added separately, the same way we add fuel
That doesn’t change the chemistry.
It would change how you perceive the chemistry
The electron acceptor would still be the oxidizer.