• @NewPerspective
    link
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To be fair, this sounds like a poorly written law. A photo or video can look like association but even more important is that nobody knows the full contents of somebody else’s brain. This person I’ve never met before, are they a Nazi? What if today they’re normal but they spend too much time on YouTube? If they’re a Nazi tomorrow then what?

    Not that they’d vote yes on a better written law, but still…

    • @troglodytis
      link
      121 year ago

      Not a proposed law. It was a proposed rule for the organization, by the organization.

      • @CharlesDarwin
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        That’s what I was trying to understand from the article. They cannot even give themselves proper standards for their party. They are truly disgusting.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other
      link
      fedilink
      -4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I have to agree. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Banning anything based on on the thoughts and opinions in someone’s head feels a little too much like thought police to me.

      • @CharlesDarwin
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        As rules for their own party? The GOP seems just fine with excommunicating Liz Cheney for upholding the rule of law, even if she agrees 100% with the platform, but they cannot keep Nazis out of their party? Weird.