At first, there was little that was surprising about a report that Christian Ziegler, the husband of Moms for Liberty co-founder Bridget Ziegler, is under police investigation in Sarasota, FL following a rape allegation. The modus operandi of Moms for Liberty and their allies is implying, often outright falsely accusing, everyone from drag queens to school librarians of being sexual predators. Lurid finger-pointing from conservatives is often, as most folks have figured out by now, a form of psychological projection. It hasn’t even been two weeks since the release of a similar story outing a Philadelphia organizer for Moms of Liberty for his 2012 conviction of sexual abuse of a 14-year-old boy.
The speed with which the Zieglers are being tossed overboard is fascinating because it wasn’t that long ago that the couple were some of the biggest rising stars in the GOP, especially in Florida.
Just as predictable were the details dug up by local reporters for the Florida Trident that the alleged victim told police “that she and both Zieglers had been involved in a three-year consensual three-way sexual relationship.” The report alleges she had been alone with Christian Ziegler, who is also the chair of the Florida GOP, the night of the alleged rape. Time and again, we have seen this story play out: The self-appointed guardians of everyone else’s sexual morality often have rather exotic sex lives of their own. Just ask Jerry Falwell Jr.
Moms for Liberty might be done, but the People behind it aren’t! They’ll be back in another election cycle or two with a different name, maybe a slightly different message.
We must always stay Vigilant against them and their message!
No doubt one of them will fuck a kid. At this point we need a bingo card with all the right-wing groups.
It’s all projection with Republicans.
They will not wait that long. The iron is hot now. They will strike now.
Yeah I was thinking the name wasn’t really important to the group working, I could be wrong but I sort of assumed most people didn’t really know the group name pushing all the crap they do at the local level. Heck a new name makes it sound like more people want the same thing and the idea is popular. I bet it barely phases their efforts, hopefully people vote otherwise though. For the record I’m in Canada so I only see the big news stories about them, I could be wildly incorrect on all of this.
I think branding still has a notable effect though. We know deplatforming and bans work online for instance, even though the Nazis hypothetically could build replacements. I think the dissolution of a group may have a more significant impact than we think.