• NeuromancerM
      link
      fedilink
      -41 year ago

      I have. I also cited you an explanation of the legal aspects of it. I suggest you read them to become more educated on the topic.

            • NeuromancerM
              link
              fedilink
              -21 year ago

              You have yet to say which part you think applies nor refuted the cites I have you. You ignore the case law or weren’t even aware if the case law.

              • @Rhoeri
                link
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                HAH!

                Dude you lost this argument the moment it started:

                The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation establishing an official religion, and by interpretation making it illegal for the government to promote theocracy or promote a specific religion with taxes.

                The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from preventing the free exercise of religion.

                While the Establishment Clause does prohibit Congress from preferring one religion over another, it does not prohibit the government’s involvement with religion to make accommodations for religious observances and practices in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.

                Just stop man. You’re embarrassing yourself.

                • NeuromancerM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 year ago

                  Who are you replying to as it has nothing to do with what I said?

                  • @Rhoeri
                    link
                    01 year ago

                    My god you’re embarrassing! It’s almost adorable!