• NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    -41 year ago

    I have. I also cited you an explanation of the legal aspects of it. I suggest you read them to become more educated on the topic.

          • NeuromancerM
            link
            fedilink
            -21 year ago

            You have yet to say which part you think applies nor refuted the cites I have you. You ignore the case law or weren’t even aware if the case law.

            • @Rhoeri
              link
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              HAH!

              Dude you lost this argument the moment it started:

              The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation establishing an official religion, and by interpretation making it illegal for the government to promote theocracy or promote a specific religion with taxes.

              The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government from preventing the free exercise of religion.

              While the Establishment Clause does prohibit Congress from preferring one religion over another, it does not prohibit the government’s involvement with religion to make accommodations for religious observances and practices in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.

              Just stop man. You’re embarrassing yourself.

              • NeuromancerM
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                Who are you replying to as it has nothing to do with what I said?

                • @Rhoeri
                  link
                  01 year ago

                  My god you’re embarrassing! It’s almost adorable!

                  • ThrowawayOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -31 year ago

                    Please do not name call. It’s part of rule 1. Consider this a warning.