Hyperloop One to Shut Down After Failing to Reinvent Transit::The company is selling assets, laying off remaining employees.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1861 year ago

    It was born to fail, because its porpoise was to delay and sabotage the California high speed train project.

        • @june
          link
          English
          431 year ago

          Yea, it wasn’t an ocean of stupid so much as Elon dangling the idea of a better alternative like the esca of an angler fish with the intention to gobble up the plans for the train project.

          • @Telstarado
            link
            English
            37
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A) I applaud you for your masterful continuation of the pelagic theme of this discussion about Elon porpoisely allowing this project to flounder into Davy Jone’s locker.

            B) TIL that an anglerfish lure is called an esca and that a sufficiently literate person can seamlessly weave such an unusual word into this net of fishy discourse… Bravo!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              91 year ago

              Never be surprised at what you may catch sight of in the ocean that is called The Internet

          • @macrocephalic
            link
            English
            171 year ago

            It’s not even like trains are his white whale, he’s just trying to break any alternative to cars before they can catch on

          • @kameecoding
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            “Better” he hyped up a stupid economically non viable shit so his car company can stay relevant

            • @QuadratureSurfer
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Looks like the jokes sailed over your head on this one. /c/woosh

        • @rwhitisissle
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          This isn’t Elon’s hyperloop. It’s a company called Hyperloop One, predominately funded by Richard Branson.

          • @kameecoding
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            Distinction without a difference

        • @NotMyOldRedditName
          link
          English
          -9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This gets misquoted all the time.

          The purpose wasn’t to delay the high speed rail, in favor of the hyperloop.

          It was to delay/stop the high speed rail for something better as he didn’t think the existing plan was high speed enough or would be cost effective and on time. Faster high speed trains were already being built and with all the delays this would (and has) faced, it’d be even further back by the time it was finished.

          The difference there is pretty important, unless you fall into the conspiracy camp of the intent was to delay it so he could sell more cars and he actually doesn’t want anything made.

          But the goal was to stop it so they’d make it better than planned, not make a hyperloop.

          Edit: and before people reply, it’s fast enough, it doesn’t need to be the best etc etc. That’s fine if that’s your stance. I’m just saying what was actually going on, and you don’t have to agree with him.

          • @dustyData
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            Just because his lie was technically a slightly different one makes no matter, it was still a lie and it was still stupid that all those government regulators and legislators fell for it.

            • @NotMyOldRedditName
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              It’s only a lie if you think his goal was to sell more cars.

              Maybe it was or wasn’t.

              • @dustyData
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                And you think Elon Musk, the man who owns a car making company, wasn’t trying to sell more cars?

                • @NotMyOldRedditName
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Well, one implies malice, and the other pushing for a better more futuristic future.

                  And he has a history of pushing for an idealistic futuristic future, with pushing spacex to figure out how to land rockets or how to make a profitable EV, so ya, I’m willing to say there’s a likely chance he was honest in thinking it was a bad idea and California, the home of silicon valley and advanced technology could maybe come up with something better.

                  But we’ll never really know.

                  • @dustyData
                    link
                    English
                    3
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    he has a history of pushing for an idealistic futuristic future

                    I want some of what you are having, because you have a warped perception of reality.

                    Tom Nicholas has really good essay on this topic. Musk is not a futurism proponent. He is an apocalyptic visionaire. His view is not preparing a better future for all humans, instead he’s about using tech for rich people surviving the end of the world whilst retaining their privileges. His futurism is fake.