• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Is that surprising? I would expect lobsters to be aerodynamic since they evolved for moving through water.

    • @Cheskaz
      link
      31 year ago

      My husband’s fun fact is that apparently they’re bodies are hydrodynamic backwards because to swim they sweep their tail up in front of them. So it’s better for them to be hydrodynamic in that direction.

      Video of how they swim.

    • @someguy3
      link
      31 year ago

      That’s a good way of looking at it.

    • @dlpkl
      link
      31 year ago

      You mean hydrodynamic. Fuck me, imagine if those things could fly

      • @funnystuff97
        link
        81 year ago

        Not a mechanical engineer, but as I understand fluid dynamics (which admittedly isn’t much):

        Aerodynamics and hydrodynamics are both branches of fluid dynamics, the fluids in question obviously being air and water. But the difference with them lies mostly in their Reynold’s Number. Particularly, if you scale your model accordingly between the different fluids w.r.t. each Reynold’s Number, you’ll find that the dynamics behave similarly. As in, you can test an airplane wing underwater and expect appropriate results.

        Which I suppose means a hydrodynamic lobster could theoretically imply an aerodynamic lobster. I think.

        • @AEsheron
          link
          21 year ago

          The short version is the two should be relatively closely related, most things that are one will likely be the other. Not always true, but a decent rule of thumb.