President Biden’s reelection campaign raised more than $1 million through online fundraising alone in the 24 hours after the president’s Jan. 6 anniversary speech, according to numbers exclusively provided to The Hill.

Biden on Friday gave a full throated attack against former President Trump, his likely GOP opponent, and warned Americans that Trump’s reelection would pose a threat to American democracy. The president zeroed in on Jan. 6 to mark the third anniversary of the U.S. Capitol riots and argued in his remarks that democracy is on the ballot in 2024.

In response to the 24-hour fundraising haul, the Biden campaign noted that they see preserving democracy as a political winner for the president in 2024.

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      411 months ago

      It’s a tactical move to avoid splitting the vote

      The only time a primary has “split the vote” in the general in modern history was when Clinton supporters voted Romney over Obama

      And Obama still won.

      Because even the majority of moderates know voting R is stupid. And no progressive is going to vote R.

      So maybe if Biden lost wed see some vote trump out of spite.

      But we’d likely see the same thing with Obama where lots of traditional non voters turn out

      • @Candelestine
        link
        English
        1211 months ago

        You just conveniently forgetting the time we handed Trump a 4 year term on a silver platter? Wasn’t that long ago.

        Fortunately for us, being the coalition party of change and progress in general, we can actually admit when we make mistakes and try to learn lessons from them. If we couldn’t do that, we wouldn’t deserve anyone’s votes anyway.

        • @givesomefucks
          link
          English
          -211 months ago

          Are…

          Are you really saying a primary is why Clinton lost?

          Does that mean you’re arguing we shouldnt have any primaries at all?

          I don’t understand how your comment is relevant if that’s not what you’re saying

          • @Candelestine
            link
            English
            1011 months ago

            Oh, absolutely Clinton lost because of the bad taste left from her primary, 100%. She handled the entire Bernie situation very, very poorly and paid the price for it.

            No, this does not mean we should get rid of primaries, that is an extremely stupid idea.

              • @jaybone
                link
                111 months ago

                I have not seen this done with emojis before…

            • @givesomefucks
              link
              English
              411 months ago

              But…

              Bernie supporters still overwhelming voted for her in the general.

              The primary wasn’t why Clinton lost, she lost because she was a terrible candidate and no one on her campaign knew what the electoral college was.

              And obviously, her team helping trump in the primary was a bigger reason she lost to trump in the general, although she’d have likely lost to anyone else too. The whole reason they helped trump was they thought he was the only candidate Hillary could win against.

              I just don’t see any logic or basis in facts in your opinions man.

              • @Candelestine
                link
                English
                -111 months ago

                Bernie supporters still overwhelming voted for her in the general.

                Got a source for that? I remember a lot of “maybe the DNC needs to learn a lesson.”

                Which, they were right, and we did. But it came at enormous cost.

                • @givesomefucks
                  link
                  English
                  511 months ago

                  It’s insane people are still asking that…

                  And to be honest you’re starting to lose benefit of the doubt here.

                  A higher percentage of registered Dems voted McCain over Obama than Bernie primary voters voted for trump.

                  https://www.npr.org/2017/08/24/545812242/1-in-10-sanders-primary-voters-ended-up-supporting-trump-survey-finds

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_and_liberal_support_for_John_McCain_in_2008

                  Normally I’d assume someone would figure out on their own that there’s a shit ton more registered Dems in 08 than people who voted for Bernie in the primary in 2016. And I wouldn’t think it was necessary to point out that a lot more than 10% of Bernie’s primary voter don’t always vote D or even consider themselves Democrats…

                  But the way this exchange has been going, I feel I need to explicitly mention that stuff.

                  You also shouldn’t be surprised if I don’t respond to any more of your comments at this point.

                  • @Candelestine
                    link
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    10% of democratic socialist supporters voting for Trump is terrifying. Do we have data on how many didn’t vote in the general at all?

                    10% of moderate dem voters supporting a moderate repub makes a lot more sense.

                    edit for a word

            • @jaybone
              link
              311 months ago

              Ahem, we paid the price for it.