President Biden’s reelection campaign raised more than $1 million through online fundraising alone in the 24 hours after the president’s Jan. 6 anniversary speech, according to numbers exclusively provided to The Hill.

Biden on Friday gave a full throated attack against former President Trump, his likely GOP opponent, and warned Americans that Trump’s reelection would pose a threat to American democracy. The president zeroed in on Jan. 6 to mark the third anniversary of the U.S. Capitol riots and argued in his remarks that democracy is on the ballot in 2024.

In response to the 24-hour fundraising haul, the Biden campaign noted that they see preserving democracy as a political winner for the president in 2024.

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    It’s a tactical move to avoid splitting the vote

    The only time a primary has “split the vote” in the general in modern history was when Clinton supporters voted Romney over Obama

    And Obama still won.

    Because even the majority of moderates know voting R is stupid. And no progressive is going to vote R.

    So maybe if Biden lost wed see some vote trump out of spite.

    But we’d likely see the same thing with Obama where lots of traditional non voters turn out

    • @Candelestine
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      You just conveniently forgetting the time we handed Trump a 4 year term on a silver platter? Wasn’t that long ago.

      Fortunately for us, being the coalition party of change and progress in general, we can actually admit when we make mistakes and try to learn lessons from them. If we couldn’t do that, we wouldn’t deserve anyone’s votes anyway.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        -21 year ago

        Are…

        Are you really saying a primary is why Clinton lost?

        Does that mean you’re arguing we shouldnt have any primaries at all?

        I don’t understand how your comment is relevant if that’s not what you’re saying

        • @Candelestine
          link
          English
          101 year ago

          Oh, absolutely Clinton lost because of the bad taste left from her primary, 100%. She handled the entire Bernie situation very, very poorly and paid the price for it.

          No, this does not mean we should get rid of primaries, that is an extremely stupid idea.

            • @jaybone
              link
              11 year ago

              I have not seen this done with emojis before…

          • @givesomefucks
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            But…

            Bernie supporters still overwhelming voted for her in the general.

            The primary wasn’t why Clinton lost, she lost because she was a terrible candidate and no one on her campaign knew what the electoral college was.

            And obviously, her team helping trump in the primary was a bigger reason she lost to trump in the general, although she’d have likely lost to anyone else too. The whole reason they helped trump was they thought he was the only candidate Hillary could win against.

            I just don’t see any logic or basis in facts in your opinions man.

            • @Candelestine
              link
              English
              -11 year ago

              Bernie supporters still overwhelming voted for her in the general.

              Got a source for that? I remember a lot of “maybe the DNC needs to learn a lesson.”

              Which, they were right, and we did. But it came at enormous cost.

              • @givesomefucks
                link
                English
                51 year ago

                It’s insane people are still asking that…

                And to be honest you’re starting to lose benefit of the doubt here.

                A higher percentage of registered Dems voted McCain over Obama than Bernie primary voters voted for trump.

                https://www.npr.org/2017/08/24/545812242/1-in-10-sanders-primary-voters-ended-up-supporting-trump-survey-finds

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_and_liberal_support_for_John_McCain_in_2008

                Normally I’d assume someone would figure out on their own that there’s a shit ton more registered Dems in 08 than people who voted for Bernie in the primary in 2016. And I wouldn’t think it was necessary to point out that a lot more than 10% of Bernie’s primary voter don’t always vote D or even consider themselves Democrats…

                But the way this exchange has been going, I feel I need to explicitly mention that stuff.

                You also shouldn’t be surprised if I don’t respond to any more of your comments at this point.

                • @Candelestine
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  10% of democratic socialist supporters voting for Trump is terrifying. Do we have data on how many didn’t vote in the general at all?

                  10% of moderate dem voters supporting a moderate repub makes a lot more sense.

                  edit for a word

                  • @givesomefucks
                    link
                    English
                    41 year ago

                    10% of democratic socialist supporters voting for Trump is terrifying

                    Yeah, I’m blocking as soon as I finish typing this…

                    For everyone else:

                    Way more than 10% of Bernie’s primary votes came from people who would never vote D in their life. He got “non voters”, 3rd parties, and even a significant amount that normally vote R.

                    All of this shit is almosy a decade old now. Anyone that genuinely had these questions really should have been able to figure this out by now, and there’s no way I’m the first to try and explain it.

                  • @Ensign_Crab
                    link
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    An alarming number of Clinton supporters voted to put Palin in the VP slot. They formed a fucking PAC to try to make it happen.

                  • @givesomefucks
                    link
                    English
                    -21 year ago

                    It the danger of “moderates” if a dem candidate is even a little progressive, they’ll stomp their feet and vote Republican so they can claim Dems lost because we ran a progressive.

                    But the good news is progressives candidates make up for them by getting the 1/3 of non voters to turn out for once.

                    Moderates try to hold the party hostage, there’s just not enough of them

                    Unfortunately they are the ones party leaders agree with

                    So the solution is to replace them through primaries.

                    Downside to that, party leaders are legally allowed to do whatever they want, even ignoring primary results.

                    It’s a fucked up situation, and anyone acting like it’s simple is likely on the side of those moderates throwing tantrums. They know it’s not simple, they just have zero qualms lying to get what they want.

          • @jaybone
            link
            31 year ago

            Ahem, we paid the price for it.