• @Grimy
    link
    English
    -21 year ago

    You are missing his point. Is Disney going after the one who is selling the copy online, or are they going after Adobe?

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In that analogy, openai is the one selling it, because their the ones using it to prop up their product.

      I didn’t think I needed to explicitly state that, but well, here we are.

      Have a nice life tho. I’m over accounts that stop replying to one thread of replies and then just go and reply to one of my other comments asking me to explain what I’ve already told them.

      Waaaay easier to just never see replies from that account

      • @Grimy
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        Some of us have to work for a living, I can’t reply to every comment the moment it comes in and it seems rude to break the chaine.

        In his analogy, openais product was the tool. You can do the same with both img gen and Photoshop, and neither of these prop up their product by implying it’s easy to copyright infringe. That’s why I said you were missing his point but you do you buddy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That guy is total loss, a tragic clown as i am not sure if i should cry or laugh about them. I am not sure what businesses they had in this argument at all except pissing off people who are better informed.

          I’ve only just saw the comment where he seemed to suggest that the final trained model contains all trained materials in full… and that combined with not once but multiple times pretending they know all about llm’s that foss ai doesnt exist and we its we that all dont know how any of this tech works… i seriously have to restrain myself to leave that gross misconception as it is as i don’t want them to respond. I hope the down-votes do their job.

          I am sorry to vent, kinda just had to :)