Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the reelection of former President Trump would be the “end of democracy” in an interview released Saturday by The Guardian.
“It will be the end of democracy, functional democracy,” Sanders said in the interview.
The Vermont senator also said in the interview that he thinks that another round of Trump as the president will be a lot more extreme than the first.
“He’s made that clear,” Sanders said. “There’s a lot of personal bitterness, he’s a bitter man, having gone through four indictments, humiliated, he’s going to take it out on his enemies. We’ve got to explain to the American people what that means to them — what the collapse of American democracy will mean to all of us.”
Sanders’s words echo those President Biden made in a recent campaign speech during which he said that Trump’s return to the presidency would risk American democracy. The president highlighted the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol in an attempt to cement a point about Trump and other Republicans espousing a kind of extremism that was seen by the world on that day.
i’m asking what makes you think leftists who won’t vote for genocide want donald trump to win.
Which candidate are they planning to vote for that has a chance of winning?
personally I’m planning to vote for cornel west but Jill Stein can still win me back
Got it. So you want Trump to win.
no, I’ll be voting against Trump
If you were voting against Trump, you would be voting for the only person who has a chance to beat Trump. Otherwise you are voting for Trump. That’s how elections work.
cornel west is running against Trump
Do you think Cornel West has a chance of winning?
deleted by creator
yes. it may be slim but the chance exists.
a vote for cornel west is not counted as a vote for trump.
you are spreading election misinformation.
Do you think Cornel West has a chance of winning?
yes. it may be slim but he has a chance.
No but it counts a vote away from another contender without hurting trump. This is the effect of FPTP voting. Essentially, if you have a vote, and you cast your vote for someone who cannot win, your vote is less useful than someone not voting at all. Voting against one candidate only hurts that candidate if the vote you cast won the election. Otherwise it was part of a split vote that helped them win.
> Essentially, if you have a vote, and you cast your vote for someone who cannot win, your vote is less useful than someone not voting at all.
impossible. why are you trying to suppress voter turnout?
the only other candidate i might want to win is jill stein, but i like cornel west ever-so-slightly more. is jill stein splitting the cornel west vote? no. there are people who she will persuade, there are people who he will persuade, and all those people are people who aren’t persuaded by the genocidal politicians we’ve already let try to run the country.
It’s not obvious?
right
Surely you mean “far right”.
no, i meant it’s not obvious.