fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agothe fuckgraphmander.xyzimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down122file-text
arrow-up1411arrow-down1imagethe fuckgraphmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square92fedilinkfile-text
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245634594_Chains_of_Affection_The_Structure_of_Adolescent_Romantic_and_Sexual_Networks1
minus-squarePunnyNamelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up73arrow-down1·1 year agoA striking lack of single dots that should be hovering around these.
minus-squareessteeyoulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·1 year agoWould you consider that a romantic or sexual relation? Or both?
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down3·1 year agoThe lines are relations. The dots are people.
minus-squareTJA!@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoYes, but the graphic is titled romantic and sexual relations. And as you deduced correctly, single dots are not relations.
A striking lack of single dots that should be hovering around these.
Would you consider that a romantic or sexual relation? Or both?
Depends on which hand you use.
The lines are relations. The dots are people.
Yes, but the graphic is titled romantic and sexual relations. And as you deduced correctly, single dots are not relations.