@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 11 months agothe fuckgraphmander.xyzimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down122file-text
arrow-up1411arrow-down1imagethe fuckgraphmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square92fedilinkfile-text
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245634594_Chains_of_Affection_The_Structure_of_Adolescent_Romantic_and_Sexual_Networks1
minus-square@PunnyNamelinkEnglish72•11 months agoA striking lack of single dots that should be hovering around these.
minus-square@essteeyoulinkEnglish36•11 months agoWould you consider that a romantic or sexual relation? Or both?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•11 months agoThe lines are relations. The dots are people.
minus-squareTJA!linkfedilinkEnglish3•11 months agoYes, but the graphic is titled romantic and sexual relations. And as you deduced correctly, single dots are not relations.
A striking lack of single dots that should be hovering around these.
Would you consider that a romantic or sexual relation? Or both?
Depends on which hand you use.
The lines are relations. The dots are people.
Yes, but the graphic is titled romantic and sexual relations. And as you deduced correctly, single dots are not relations.