• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We watched him collude with Russia on national TV with our own eyes. Whatever links you have will never undo that.

    • Digital_Prophet
      link
      fedilink
      47
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol “Id like to push back by linking two youtube videos, one from the hill and the other from RNN.”

      We only accept infowars and parler links as legitimate sources, sorry!

      edit: And pornhub links!

      • ElleChaise
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        The weird thing here is that when you run these sources through one of those media bias websites, TRNN says ‘far left bias’, and The Hill says ‘slight left bias’. Are these bias sites blind; or am I just missing what having a ‘left bias’ means? Is there some far-left plan by whatever think tank to make me want to support this idea, which I very much do not support? An idea which usually falls under the ‘extreme right-wing’ category, no less? What the hell?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          271 year ago

          that’s the ‘crypto’ part. hidden. they pretend to be leftist yet always attack leftists and never corporate or right wing. disinformation artists and grifters.

          • @frunch
            link
            91 year ago

            disinformation artists hacks and grifters.

        • Lemminary
          link
          26
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That other person with the links likes to listen to weird conspiracy theories, particularly Jimmy Dore. Check the communities they moderate. I wouldn’t put too much thought into what they post and comment, tbh.

          And they always act like they’re so enlightened and unfased when they get called out, it’s kind of eerie.

        • @jimmydoreisalefty
          link
          -201 year ago

          I give you props for looking them up and checking the media bias websites!

      • @jimmydoreisalefty
        link
        -331 year ago

        Not sure what you are on about…

        This is the internet, once in a while you may run into subjects you don’t agree with.

        Many well-known and respected independent journalists have discussed this subject at length.

        • Lemminary
          link
          301 year ago

          The problem is that you’re very partial to people who like to pedal conspiracy theories. It’s not the first time I’ve seen you link to questionable sources.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              241 year ago

              Ah yes, Glenn Greenwald. The guy who bravely fights for America’s freedom… from his home in Brazil.

              • @frunch
                link
                71 year ago

                Well you said you wanted a source, but you didn’t say a reliable or trustworthy source…

            • TigrisMorte
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              The guy known to peddle pootie provided documents to fools in the mainstream? not the flex you are looking for.

        • @jordanlundM
          link
          21 year ago

          What I’m saying is, he continues to have a vested interest in disproving Russiagate. I’d be more interested in hearing what someone completely disconnected from Russia has to say about it.

          • @jimmydoreisalefty
            link
            01 year ago

            Ah, okay.

            Only a few are that ou spoken, and they all get labeled far-right or russian asset.

            Same as the whistleblowers, which are human with bias in them.

    • TigrisMorte
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Pure garbage that undoubtedly references each other as “proof”.
      45, and a large portion of the Republican conference is in pootie’s pocket.