• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Assuming your math is right, a different way of imagining this is that 20 of these wipe out all other power generation systems with enough overproduction to power desalination and/or carbon capture from the atmosphere.

    I know that there are currently problems with both of those systems, but at least carbon capture is going to have to be sorted out once we have excess capacity. Otherwise, whatever climate we’ve created will remain for hundreds, maybe thousands of years.

    Of course, one slight problem is that this would need to be replicated worldwide.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Excellent points all around! The more it’s done the easier and cheaper it becomes

      Gotta start where we are, so the solution to the problems you mention is to just keep going until a better solution arises.

    • @Anticorp
      link
      31 year ago

      Is there enough available, usable land in California for 20 of these?

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Wish I could find an easy way to show 4,600 acres overlaid on a California map.

        You could get 6.5 of these in an area the size of San Franciso (30,000 acres). Relative to the size of California, that’s a pixel or three.

        There are vast areas of desert out there.

        • @Anticorp
          link
          41 year ago

          A lot of that open land is BLM land, so idk if they could get it re-zoned for this type of use. I suppose they could use the Eastern desert portion, assuming they can build the grid to transfer the power, and actually finish the ecological impact reports.

            • @Anticorp
              link
              21 year ago

              Yeah, I completely agree. I’m sure there are groups that won’t though, and that’s the kind of stuff that really stalls these types of projects.