China Installed More Solar Panels Last Year Than the U.S. Has in Total::China installed more new solar capacity last year than the total amount ever installed in any other country.

  • NickwithaC
    link
    English
    5711 months ago

    Good news for one of the planet’s most polluting countries.

    • @Nesola
      link
      English
      8711 months ago

      That is producing for the rest of the world and especially for the west. It’s hypocritical to blame china while buying stuff that had to be cheaper and cheaper.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3211 months ago

        The average consumer doesn’t actually have a choice in the matter. Unless you are wealthy enough to purchase only local artisan made goods near everything you can afford is made in China or made in China adjacent.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s not really the point. The point is their emissions will be higher because they’re producing all the stuff everyone else purchases. The production is what creates pollution. If they stopped producing then other countries would and they would increase their pollution.

          It’s not saying don’t buy products from China. It’s saying China polluted because things are bought from them. The pollution would be wherever production is taking place.

          • @Nesola
            link
            English
            1011 months ago

            That is exactly my point. Thanks for elaborating it!

          • @RaoulDook
            link
            English
            011 months ago

            Did you forget about the existence of regulations to control the pollution that manufacturing is allowed to produce? How about the countries who are allowing pollution to happen on a ridiculous scale fix their environmental regulations? It’s not like they are under the rule of the USA and have to pollute because we say so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          711 months ago

          You could simply not purchase as much crap. Half of the factories that supply the West’s goods would go out of business if people stopped buying new phones and shitty plastics every full moon.

          • @Land_Strider
            link
            English
            211 months ago

            Oh no, that’s the freedom way. Gods forbid, they’d be living like the bland Soviet blocks otherwise.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Gods forbid, they’d be living like the bland Soviet blocks otherwise.

              Please don’t exaggerate, to live like in late USSR you’d have to literally outlaw local non-state production.

              They’d be living just fine. Everything would be more expensive, but with the way prices are connected to power balance and cheap Chinese workers affecting that balance on the side of producers, maybe not as expensive as people imagine.

        • @Sunfoil
          link
          English
          311 months ago

          They do. I boycott Chinese made goods, and I don’t make much money. It just requires a small amount of introspection on if I need the item. It has actually turned out I buy much much less because what I do buy is of quality and lasts.

          Cosmetics, Household goods and food are easy and generally fairly locally made and produced, unless you insist on buying exotic fruits or stuff way out of season.

          Clothes, shoes, anything fabric, again easy. Massive market of quality eco-friendly EU/US/UK made stuff that means I pay $30 for a lovely shirt that will last me decades than $5 a shirt that was made by a child in Myanmar and fall apart within the year. So I am slowly developing a modest wardrobe of high quality natural fibres.

          You don’t really need much else. But it just takes a moment to Google and consume conscientiously.

          Some stuff is nearly impossible and is actually outside of your control like fuel and SOME electrical devices. But nothing can be perfect.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          Then you cannot complain about corporations moving jobs overseas. Clearly was the only way for the society to survive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Just remove “made in China” from your basket. And buy just what you need. It’s my a good beginning.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Reduce, reuse, recycle.

          If I don’t need it to work or live I don’t buy it from places I know have a slave labor issue or any other ethics concerns.

          Another thing that help, ad block. Honestly advertising is brain rot and why a lot of people feel a compulsion to buy land fill filler.

      • @Gigan
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        I don’t think that absolves China of any blame. They’re still choosing to produce cheap goods at the expense of the planet, because it’s good business for them too.

        • @essteeyou
          link
          English
          2911 months ago

          If not them then it’d be someone else. Clearly they’re starting to take polluting seriously.

          If you look at CO2 emissions per capita then China is actually doing better than countries like Canada, the US, and Singapore. Assuming I haven’t completely misread that table.

          • @wikibotB
            link
            English
            311 months ago

            Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

            This is a list of sovereign states and territories by per capita carbon dioxide emissions due to certain forms of human activity, based on the EDGAR database created by European Commission. The following table lists the 1970, 1990, 2005, 2017 and 2022 annual per capita CO2 emissions estimates (in kilotons of CO2 per year). The data only consider carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and cement manufacture, but not emissions from land use, land-use change and forestry Over the last 150 years, estimated cumulative emissions from land use and land-use change represent approximately one-third of total cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Emissions from international shipping or bunker fuels are also not included in national figures, which can make a large difference for small countries with important ports. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report finds that the “Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU)” sector on average, accounted for 13-21% of global total anthropogenic GHG emissions in the period 2010–2019.

            to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

          • PatFusty
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -511 months ago

            CO2 emissions are carefully curated and we are not even that good at calculating them. I wouldn’t trust any of this info coming from China let alone from any nation.

              • PatFusty
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 months ago

                Big dog 2 months… If you knew how companies figure out their pollution metrics you would be very sad.

                As for a better metric, I don’t know. Everything is tied to cost so it’s really dumb

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  09 months ago

                  Not sure why you’re so hung up on dogs or 2 months. The thread still shows up in searches and you’re clearly getting updates on it. Unless there’s some evidence to suggest the information in this thread is now obsolete, there’s no reason not to respond.

                  @[email protected] made a claim and provided evidence. Unless there’s better evidence to the contrary it’s reasonable to accept the claim. My children sometimes still respond to arguments with, “Nuh uh.” I generally expect more from adults.

      • @CosmoNova
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        You‘re right. We should move production to cleaner countries.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 months ago

          Production will always have some waste and pollution. China has high pollution because we do a lot of production there. As I pointed out above, on both a per-capita and a per-production basis China pollutes less than many industrialized nations (US. Germany, Japan, South Korea, Canada, Taiwan) and many developing nations (Singapore, Malaysia).

          Given current manufacturing data, moving production out of China to other countries would likely increase pollution.

      • @RememberTheApollo
        link
        English
        -211 months ago

        No, it’s not hypocritical. Yes, anyone with half a brain knows China makes a huge chunk of the world’s stuff.

        A nation can make choices as to what energy sources they use and China went balls to the wall with coal. That wasn’t a choice the buyers of Chinese products made.

        • @Land_Strider
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          Lol look what they are spending the money they earn from those industries. At least they are not solely funding decades long genocide but actually doing something about the emissions they take on.

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3211 months ago

      Only way many western countries were able to slow their rise in CO2 emissions. Despite outsourcing their emissions to China, the US still emits twice the CO2 per capita compared with China.

      • PatFusty
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Bad manufacturing practices that exploits a poor labor force. They use this to their advantage to persuade western companies to provide cheap service at the cost of their workforce and sustainability. They then turn around and make these grand plans of Eco friendly targets while their populace regularly burn their trash with little regulation. Then some regulation agency comes in and turns a blind eye to some foul shit as long as they are paid accordingly to play ball.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          When you look at the data China pollutes less than the US both on a per-capita and a per-production basis.

          • PatFusty
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Big dog why are you going back in time 2 months to respond to this

    • @angrymouse
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      Actually they are poluting for you to buy your stuff cheaper, who is responsible for the polution of your stuff? Dowa not make any sense to blame them for factories that the west choosed to put there.

      • geogle
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        They could always say no

    • @iAvicenna
      link
      English
      311 months ago

      polluting to meet the online shopping demands of western countries

    • @Rooter
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      A lot of people don’t realize how quickly China is changing. Things that were true just a few decades ago are often no longer true.

      Once China decided that pollution was a problem they went all in on addressing it. China has massive reforestation projects, huge incentives to switch to EVs, and much tighter energy efficiency standards.

      Solar isn’t even their only renewable energy source. China gets about equal amounts from solar, wind and hydro https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/013124-coal-still-accounted-for-nearly-60-of-chinas-electricity-supply-in-2023-cec together they make up a little less than half of their total energy production and the ratio keeps improving. correction: those are projected ratios, not current ratios.

      Of course, on a per capita basis, China isn’t even close to being a top polluter. Unless you think that people in smaller countries deserve to pollute more, per-capita is the better measurement. China looks a little worse if you do that but it’s still far from a top polluter by that metric.