Many “alternative” search engines are better for privacy, but they are still vulnerable to censorship, because they rely on g**gle and m*crosoft’s indices for their search results. This isn’t a deep-hidden secret either, many of them disclose what search index they use on the “about” page, for example:

There are still search engines that (claim to) maintain their own index. Most surprisingly, br*ve:

  • Funderpants
    link
    fedilink
    55
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I use Kagi, and while it does use google index, it also uses many other indexes and its own index. I wonder how this impacts censorship.

    https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-sources.html

    Edit : Not much detail here but they do comment on it here :

    https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-quality.html

    Avoiding Censorship and Bias

    We do our best to avoid censorship and bias. Some results from traditional sources will reflect biases, but they’ll be balanced by results from other sources. Also, we have built product features to help with bias reduction. For example, our “World News” Lens includes articles from respectable media outlets across the globe.

    One of the signals that does influence our ranking is the presence of ads or trackers. We penalize bloated sites regardless of their agendas.

    • balderdash
      link
      fedilink
      9210 months ago

      I like the idea, but I can’t justify $10 a month. Downvote me or whatever, but I’m broke and need to cut as many subscriptions as possible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5410 months ago

        That’s fair.

        You could argue that it’s worth the money to get better results and avoid Google, but with so many companies trying to take $10 a month you have to draw the line somewhere.

      • the_weez
        link
        fedilink
        4010 months ago

        No, I’m with you. $120 a year is too steep for searching for me. I like what they are trying to do but I don’t think the average person will spend that much.

      • Norgur
        link
        fedilink
        1410 months ago

        Why downvote? That’s a fair point. There is a free tier with a few free searches per year (2000 or something). You could sign up and use this budget whenever your search engine of choice fails you.

        • qaz
          link
          109 months ago

          The free tier is 100 searches one time only.

          • Norgur
            link
            fedilink
            79 months ago

            Really? Dangit, I’m misremembering stuff then it seems. Sorry.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              49 months ago

              Your partly right, when I just started using Kagi it was a certain number of free searches per month.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        139 months ago

        make it $1 per month and i’m game, i’m not paying more for a search engine than i do for email holy shit

      • Funderpants
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yea, I just think I either pay for something like Kagi, or I am subject to something like Google. I’m not sure there is a third way that pays for the servers and talent needed to deliver search results, but my imagination might just be limited.

    • @hardaysknight
      link
      English
      2810 months ago

      I swear to God you people must work for Kagi.

      • Funderpants
        link
        fedilink
        22
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Lol, I know how you feel. Not long ago there was suddenly a bunch of chatter about it on Lemmy and I was thinking the same thing, that it had to be marketing. But I’m a curious sort and I was so sick of bad google results so I tried it.

        Now that I have used Kagi I’m convinced it was organic chatter. I really do like it, I think it’s better, and if they offered money for posts I’d take that money because I’m paying $10 a month for a search engine, lol.

      • mac
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        I thought this was a possibility at first, then I used it. The lad time is basically instant, the results are always good and it has a bunch of features with AI etc.

      • M137
        link
        29 months ago

        Or people just like it? This isn’t hard to understand and has always been a thing. When people find something they really like they will tell other people about it.

        • @hardaysknight
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          That’s possible, but when every comment mentioning it has a 1000 word count, it screams advertisement to me.

      • Funderpants
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        With Kagi I get what I want and sort through way less to no junk. With their lenses I can push reliable sources up and other sources down. I really like it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1010 months ago

          Yeah. I hope that they provide a way to exclude Brave from the search engines (not optimistic considering the libertarian tech bro tantrum the lead dev threw but…).

          But I think the advantage is really the personalized results over anything else. Sometimes you get some REAL fucked up SEO-heavy results. So you just block that site. And then everything works.

          It DOES make me more than a bit concerned over how much data they have on me (especially as you need to use an access token to use it in an incognito window… where you are searching for the sketchiest shit) but… google already has that so…

          • @PopOfAfrica
            link
            7
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            They claim that no information on searches is a saved to an individual for now.

              • @PopOfAfrica
                link
                610 months ago

                I will say part of the reason I find them more trustworthy is that their business model hinges on some sort of ounce of privacy. Google’s hinges on exactly the opposite.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  810 months ago

                  I strongly encourage reading up on the various VPNs and the like that charge people while still monitoring and tracking everything they do.

      • Funderpants
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Similar yes. Kagi has more features and no ads (because paid) but yes, it’s a similar idea.

      • @douglasg14b
        link
        29 months ago

        That and kagi does its own indexing unlike startpage, as well as its own page and data analysis for enriched queries and research.

        IMHO they add enough of their own value that you’re not going to get elsewhere that it’s worth paying for.