• @AbouBenAdhem
    link
    English
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can see the argument for having a connector that can’t be pulled out: if you were crossing a busy street or walking down a stairway with one of these strapped to your head and the cable came out, you’d be instantly blind.

      • Joelk111
        link
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No one, yet. The idea is (very obviously, I might mention) that we will be wearing AR or VR glasses just like many wear a smartwatch or carry a phone.

        • @Nyxon
          link
          English
          141 year ago

          Actually I would argue it is VR first and AR second because in its dormant, non-powered state your view is completely blocked whereas if it were AR first you would just be looking through transparent glass lenses in its dormant, non-powered state.

          Apple’s final destination with this product is AR and they are using it as AR but it is a VR headset replicating an AR experience because we do not have the technology yet to make something like this being AR dominant.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I say AR because they do full video passthrough first and have their UIs try to look a part of the real life environment (shadow effects on irl objects, menus are all semitransparent, etc).

            You have to choose to do immersion instead, even the dorky eyes are implied to make it useful in IRL settings.

            Not everything is good (the eyes are a total miss, the avatars are uncanny).

    • @RookiA
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      First of all this should NOT be the use case, it is dangerous, stupid, idiotic and shows that you dont care for your life and others.

    • @weeeeum
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      But the proprietary connector plug itself is almost identical to the lightning connector, the only difference is that the bolster has some notches in it for the BATTERY to lock into. All the locking is in the battery, they could have, should have, used USB C or any other existing connector.

      • @abhibeckert
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        the only difference is that the bolster has some notches in it for the BATTERY to lock into

        Um, it has twice as many pins. The same number of pins as thunderbolt which likely isn’t a coincidence.

        • @efstajas
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          Exactly, so it could’ve just been USB C

    • @T156
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      deleted by creator