@LMAO is flooding the site with random communities because they’re salty about being banned for claiming too many community names. They claim they’re trying to “fuck your entire site up” but I imagine it’s a relatively quick fix to delete all the communities they’re creating, LMAO.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3271 year ago

    Looking at his profile

    Since you banned my main for claiming community names, I’ll just fuck your entire site up instead. Much love, Angled

    Yeah can’t imagine why an instance admin might not want this insufferable piece of shit in their instance.

    • @tpfm
      link
      English
      681 year ago

      I bet it’s really spez, same energy

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        451 year ago

        Doesn’t help too much, you can generate infinite email accounts with gmail for an example.

        Manual acceptance of each and every user helps, but it’s not sustainable.

        • @Stuka
          link
          English
          251 year ago

          Don’t even need that, 1 click temporary email boxes everywhere

          • @S_204
            link
            English
            311 year ago

            That’s what I used… I have no intention of being a troll or asshole, but I don’t want social media like this platform linked to me IRL and never have.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Personally I just use a dumping ground email address. Just an address i use for any website I don’t particularly trust that I never look at unless I know there’s a confirmation email waiting for me

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            True, but a common thing websites do is block those domains, at least the easier to find ones. Nearly nobody blocks gmail.

              • @pandacoder
                link
                English
                81 year ago

                Some sites do this and it’s annoying. A better check is to compare the part before the + if it’s Gmail.

                  • @incognito_15
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Whether or not Lemmy supports this at this point, I dunno, but it’s easy enough to code your username verification to remove all +s and periods before continuing to ensure uniqueness.

                  • @kvadd
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    That is not actually true. The + method works, but not the . method.

      • @Necronomicommunist
        link
        English
        801 year ago

        Idk, seems like this is quite a pivotal time with an influx of users. Be a shame to have the potential growth in community go to waste.

        • @PlasticExistence
          link
          English
          231 year ago

          Counterpoint: we don’t need growth if the cost is the destruction of a good thing. Guided growth is smarter and more sustainable especially when users like the subject of this post aren’t unique. There are a lot of small, mean-spirited people out there who will take a dump all over everything the moment they can.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate
          link
          English
          211 year ago

          True, but they could limit community creation to, say, five a day. That would be more than the vast majority of people would legitimately need.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Unfortunately that would mean that real communities wouldn’t be created since that would be used up by someone creating spam communities. Though, maybe limiting the amount of communities that could be made by one account in a certain amount of time? What about verification by email (to send a coherent reason) to the admins to create a community.

            • AFK BRB Chocolate
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              I was meaning five per day for a given user. That’s why I said that would be plenty for most individuals - most people aren’t legitimately going to want to create more than five communities in a day, and for them it wouldn’t be a hardship to wait a day for another five. But for people like this guy, trying to flood the instance with endless/pointless communities, it would cut that down to a manageable number.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Oh 😅 I’m sorry for misunderstanding. 5 communities per day in a week is 35 communities, which I also thought was a lot. Where do we send our suggestions to the admins though?

                • AFK BRB Chocolate
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  I asked that question a while back and was told to use their git site.

        • Ataraxia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          Growth for the sake of growth is why reddit and everything else crashes and burns.

          • EuphoricPenguin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 year ago

            Eeh, federated platforms add a lot more moving parts to the mix. Since there isn’t a single Lemmy that is all of Lemmy, people can always move to another instance if this one goes to shit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            There are always going to be assholes who abuse the system, always. I agree with the other poster that now is a good time to get communities up and running. People like LMAO have nothing but time to be internet douchebags and find ways around the system.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          An power user in this case still can MP admins, to ask the creation of the community “manually”.

      • @Rhoeri
        link
        English
        181 year ago

        That would be giving these assholes exactly what they want.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Maybe, but what’s the alternative? Other trolls seeing this vulnerability and just letting it run?

          I would venture that these assholes just want maximum carnage. Requiring admin approval for a few days while a fix is pushed would mitigate that carnage.

          • @dragontamer
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            I mean, purging them likely isn’t taking that much admin time?

            One click, and bam, all their communities, usernames, etc. etc. are gone.

      • @Necronomicommunist
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        Idk, seems like this is quite a pivotal time with an influx of users. Be a shame to have the potential growth in community go to waste.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Verifying community creation wouldn’t inconvenience users, though it will place a lot of work on the admins having to sift through spam. Limiting the amount of community creations would essentially mean that it will all be used up by spam communities, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      He got his fee-fees hurt because others didn’t like that he was trying to be a selfish asshole (shocking) so now he thinks it’s justice to destroy a site and affect multiple people who didn’t even do anything to him. 😂 jfc