• FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    -59 months ago

    People speculate on the price of “normal currency” too.

    • rigatti
      link
      English
      69 months ago

      But faaaarr fewer than those who use it for transactions. In the crypto world it’s reversed.

        • @General_Effort
          link
          English
          49 months ago

          Yes, the price fluctuations created by speculation make it hard to use for payment. How do you agree on a fair price when you don’t know what the “money” will be worth in a few weeks.

          The deflationary effect caused by hoarding currency, as is done with bitcoin, would bring about a Great Depression scenario in a real economy.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            -19 months ago

            If you need the token’s price to be stable then there are stabletokens specifically designed for that.

              • FaceDeer
                link
                fedilink
                09 months ago

                It varies, there are a bunch of different types of stabletokens. The two main approaches I’m aware of are:

                • Tokens that are issued and backed by a trusted third party. Tether, for example, issues one USDT token for every USD that is deposited with Tether Inc. and you can redeem USDTs for USD again any time. I’m not particularly fond of this approach, but it’s simple and popular and as long as you’re not holding USDT long-term I don’t see a big problem with it as a day-to-day currency. Just make sure the issuing company is audited and you’re prepared for the possibility that they could turn out to be lying.

                • Tokens that are issued by on-chain smart contracts, backed by other digital assets. DAI and Liquity are examples of these. They are more complicated but IMO the better choice because you don’t have to trust anyone - you can see the token’s backing right on the blockchain itself and know whether it’s actually worth what the stabletoken needs for support.

                One of the nice things about the on-chain smart contract stabletokens is that they can be backed by less-stable tokens, such as Ether itself, so you can get the best of both worlds out of them.

                • @General_Effort
                  link
                  English
                  29 months ago

                  Ok, so a stablecoin means, that the holder gives an unsecured, zero-interest loan to a company with unknown credit worthiness. It’s “stable” because a $1 debt stays a 1$ debt. That’s a nice spin on zero interest. It’s not what I’d call a currency. Or sane, reasonable, sensible, …

                  I note that tether is known for not allowing audits. Are you for real?

                  The other option is that the loan is collateralized in crypto. And you can’t actually redeem the stablecoin for money, you can only get crypto that trades for $1, allegedly. On the liquity site I wasn’t able to see how the price is determined. I did see that there is a redemption fee of variable, unknown size. I’m not quite clear how that is supposed to be sane.

                  • FaceDeer
                    link
                    fedilink
                    19 months ago

                    Ok, so a stablecoin means, that the holder gives an unsecured, zero-interest loan to a company with unknown credit worthiness.

                    No. Neither of the approaches I described means that. You can check the credit-worthiness of Tether and other such companies (Tether was just an example, there are many others) and decide whether you want to use their token based on what you learn if you wish. As I said, you only need the token to last for as long as you’re using it for, so if you’re running a storefront for example you can be paid in those tokens and immediately trade them for something you trust more.

                    And you can’t actually redeem the stablecoin for money, you can only get crypto that trades for $1, allegedly.

                    The stablecoin is worth $1, yes. That’s the point of the stablecoin. The “allegedly” part is not actually allegedly, it’s part of how the smart contract backing the token operates.

                    Are you for real?

                    Yes. I get the impression that you’re arguing in bad faith, though. I’m happy to discuss the details of how these things work but you’re calling this “insane” and that’s not a particularly useful mindset for learning.

    • @TheGrandNagus
      link
      English
      69 months ago

      I’m well aware.

      But far, far, far, far more people use it as currency. Exchanging it for goods and services is clearly the main use for it.

      Crypto is used like a stock.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        -29 months ago

        In addition to using it as a currency, sure. But as I asked rigatti, is that a problem? At worst one might perhaps argue that the name “cryptocurrency” is misleading, but I’ve never cared much about semantics like that.

        • @TheGrandNagus
          link
          English
          09 months ago

          You’re saying “in addition to using it as a currency” as if that’s actually what people do with crypto. They don’t.

          And yeah, it is a problem. It renders it useless outside of as a bit of gambling on the side.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Alright, so let’s call them cryptotokens instead. I’ve always preferred that myself, it’s a much more general description of what they do. It doesn’t change what they are but if that term makes you happier we can go with that.

            It renders it useless outside of as a bit of gambling on the side.

            Hardly, there are lots of things you can do with these things. A ledger is more than just for tracking money, it’s a database. You really can’t think of useful things that could be done with a completely decentralized and permissionless database?

            • @TheGrandNagus
              link
              English
              09 months ago

              People don’t use bitcoin or other cryptocoins as a general purpose database. They use it as they’d use a stock.

              • FaceDeer
                link
                fedilink
                09 months ago

                Bitcoin, no, because it’s a hopelessly out of date blockchain that actively resists having new capabilities added to it. Ethereum, on the other hand, is designed that way from the ground up. Many of the other smaller but more modern blockchains are also like that.

                • @TheGrandNagus
                  link
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  And yet they’re still used like a stock and you can’t really use them as a currency.

                  • FaceDeer
                    link
                    fedilink
                    19 months ago

                    You can’t use them as a currency everywhere. But the same can be said for any other currency too. You can’t use US dollars everywhere. You can’t use Chinese Yuan everywhere. And so forth. A currency doesn’t have to be universally accepted everywhere on the planet for every application before it’s useful.

                    Regardless, I was talking about using Ethereum as a distributed database.

      • @deafboy
        link
        English
        -29 months ago

        There are people who ride the bike as a means of transport. Then there are people who build their entire identity around riding a bike. That doesn’t mean one or the other rides it wrong.

        A token of value can have multiple different usecases at the same time.

        • @TheGrandNagus
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Bikes are used as a mode of transport. That’s what everybody uses them for.

          Crypto isn’t really used as a currency. It is used like a stock. That’s what everybody uses them for, if we’re being honest.