• EinatYahavOP
    link
    fedilink
    -589 months ago

    Both parties are against cannibalism, I’m pretty sure. Both parties are equally susceptible to hoaxes.

    • Lopen's Left Arm
      link
      fedilink
      589 months ago

      One party in particular makes a habit out of blowing up literal non-issues into doomsday political theater though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        199 months ago

        One party in particular benefits more from making those non issues into dog and pony shows. The bullshit asymmetry principle.

    • @Feathercrown
      link
      English
      399 months ago

      No they aren’t equally susceptible to hoaxes, and you can tell that’s true because I can predict which party she’s from.

    • Melllvar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      199 months ago

      Both parties are equally susceptible to hoaxes.

      Don’t confuse fallibility with gullibility.

      • @rtxn
        link
        English
        99 months ago

        The main difference is the “willful” part of ignorance.

    • @AbidanYre
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      What’s the democratic equivalent of this? Or kitty litter in schools? Or any of the Q nonsense?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 months ago

        Rep. Heather Scott, a Republican, introduced a bill that would expand the state’s existing criminal cannibalism law to prohibit any person from “willfully provid[ing] the flesh or blood of a human being to another person to ingest without such person’s knowledge or consent.”

    • @grabyourmotherskeys
      link
      129 months ago

      If Biden made an anti-cannabalism speech, R’s would be coming out for it in hours. And don’t forget how Russia is totally cool with cannabalism for that tip of the hat to the far right.