• @parachaye
    link
    English
    184 months ago

    I’m indifferent, since I’ve got both installed, there’s no escaping having to use WhatsApp in many countries around the globe. If I want to keep in touch with family/friends then only one or two contacts use signal, for everyone else it’s WhatsApp or the alternative is SMS.

    I’m also indifferent though because of I want the interoperability, Beeper is doing fine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      It’s different, because not being forced to use their app and have WhatsApp account to still talk to someone there?

      • @parachaye
        link
        English
        44 months ago

        It’s certainly different, but for signal users who want to maintain that level of privacy, it’s probably something they want, right? From their perspective this is probably a good decision.

        I’m indifferent because I’d personally rather have interoperability and Beeper gets the job done.

    • @joel_feila
      link
      English
      -14 months ago

      That is one good thing about america, whatsapp never caught

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        144 months ago

        Yeahhh it’s amazing, your choices are a closed platform that forces you to buy their expensive devices, or SMS, or another proprietary platform ran by a notorious privacy predator.

          • @RazorsLedge
            link
            English
            114 months ago

            SMS sucks. Not private and it handcuffs you to a phone. Who wants to type on a phone when you’re at a real keyboard?

            • @duffman
              link
              English
              6
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Sms has been god awful since the beginning, both the standard and the business implementation. Remember bullshit pricing models for texts? 10center per text over your limit. Even today, the standard hasn’t kept up with modern times.

            • Victor
              link
              English
              24 months ago

              That’s the only reason I started using Telegram. It might not be secure or whatever, but it sure is nice to have voice and video calling on a nice-looking desktop app. It’s the only one I was able to get my family to use, and that I already had some friends using.

              But I could never get them to use advanced shit like SimpleX or something similar lol. “But this already works?” Yeeeaaah but… Nah, it’ll never fly. 😑

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 months ago

              Theoretically anyone at the right point can read all your SMS texts.

              A great example being the police “stingray tower” system that masquerades as a cell tower that your phone will happily (and quietly) connect to.

              Convince a phone that you’re just another authorized relay, have a target in mind, and it’s like reading postcards before they hit the mailbox.

              This is also why it’s an absolute joke for 2FA, but institutions like banks still happily use it because it’s easy to understand.

              • lemmyvore
                link
                fedilink
                English
                34 months ago

                Not only easy to understand but for a while it was the only way to do 2fa that was usable by lots of people. Smartphones aren’t as ubiquitous as people think, even today.

                SMS’s fall from grace wasn’t actually that it could be intercepted, it was the fact it started being used as an excuse to ask for a phone number and use that to track people.

                Google still won’t allow you to use any form of 2fa if you don’t give them a phone number. Twitch/Amazon too. Facebook used to (until they got Whatsapp, now they don’t need to ask.) LinkedIn used to (until they got broken into so many times it became a humongous liability).