• YTG123
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Perhaps you can encode them as computation (i.e. a function of arbitrary precision)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Hard to do as those functions are often limits and need infinite function applications. I’m telling you, math.PI is a finite lie!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      May I propose a dedicated circuit (analog because you can only ever approximate their value) that stores and returns transcendental/irrational numbers exclusively? We can just assume they’re going to be whatever value we need whenever we need them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Wouldn’t noise in the circuit mean it’d only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren’t precise enough doesn’t mean they’ll never be.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            You can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.