The French government issued a decree Tuesday banning the term “steak” on the label of vegetarian products, saying it was reserved for meat alone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    Vegan products have a clear label on them

    And why shouldn’t meat products have a clear label?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yes, I think I advocated here alone two to three times for that and I will stay by your side if you do demand that.

      We could make it easier for all with a “animal product” label but at the moment it is only the animal industry which is lobbying for restrictive product names.

      If you don’t want to then legislate for a label like the (V)egan label and put it on all products made from animals, I would still support you.

      I am all in for clear description of food and a big label if it contains animal suffering and the destruction of the eco system or if it is plant based.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -39 months ago

        That kind of label already exists: It resembles the shape of the letters “Steak” so closely one might even mistake it for the word.

        Why, pray tell, are you insistent on diluting the clarity of that label? Is it so aesthetically pleasing to you that you just cannot help yourself but enjoy it even though you don’t want to have to do anything with meat?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          Well, I guess it shows that some people learn only shapes instead of reading.

          Still unclear who was killed, maybe there are some more shapes around? They indicate what Animal it was, you know there is more than one?

          Now imagine if you will, we could use that space where it says “pig” and replace it with “saitan” for example? Mind blown, if you put 2 or more of these cryptic runes together we can transport more information.

          I don’t care much for it, it is for those who want to stop supporting the destruction of the planet and the murdering of billions of sentient beings for their pleasure. It makes it easier for them if they don’t have to change too much.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -29 months ago

            Now imagine if you will, we could use that space where it says “pig” and replace it with “saitan” for example? Mind blown,

            Now imagine if you will, we could use that space where it says “organic” and replace it with “pork”, for example? “pork cauliflower”. Makes perfect sense.

            I don’t care much for it, it is for those who want to stop supporting the destruction of the planet and the murdering of billions of sentient beings

            No. It is for people who want to proclaim superior morality but are too lazy to switch their shopping habits from “steak” to “soy patty”. If y’all are so virtuous that should really not be an issue for you.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Who do you think acts more superior, those who kill others for pleasure and destroy the ground, water and air by doing so, or those who don’t need that? Lion on top of the food chain, thats what you are, right?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                That’s not the discussion at hand.

                I tried very hard to have this discussion without getting into ethics, and I won’t have that discussion either, even if you try to force it on me, even if your personal set of ethics is all you care about in the world at the expense of everything else, including seeing other people’s point of view.

                This is about labelling, in particular non-confusing labelling. And how “plant steak” is just as confusing and misleading as “meat cauliflower”.

                Just as confusing and nonsensical as “plastic paper” or “liquid mug”. Are you cognitively capable of looking at those latter two terms without moralising? If yes, why not the the previous two?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  39 months ago

                  I tried very hard to have this discussion without getting into ethics,

                  It is for people who want to proclaim superior morality

                  You go into it. Not me.

                  Tell me what part of which animal “Steak” is and show me there are no variants and you win.

                  It is not only steak, it is milk where the industry lobbied hard to prevent the use even though plant milk is older than the milk of other species.

                  Are you cognitively capable of looking at those latter two terms without moralising? If yes, why not the the previous two?

                  You are the one who brought up moral, maybe that is a you problem you should take care of without projecting.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -2
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    You go into it. Not me.

                    You did:

                    it is for those who want to stop supporting the destruction of the planet and the murdering of billions of sentient beings for their pleasure.

                    You don’t even notice it, do you. You’re the walking, talking, stereotype of a preachy vegan, leaving out no opportunity to signal how oh superior you are to everyone else because you stick to a certain set of behaviours you call ethical. Tough luck: I’m not going to treat you as a saint for that but just like any other human with dietary preference for any random reason, and that’s for your own good.

                    It is not only steak, it is milk where the industry lobbied hard to prevent the use even though plant milk is older than the milk of other species.

                    What. You mean the Indo-European Urpeople ground nuts into paste and diluted them with water? They definitely had millstones but that’s a lot of work for what reason exactly, you can eat nuts and drink water without preparing them while meanwhile, they were nomadic pastoralists. It’s where the lot of Europe and India have our lactose tolerance from. Indians even kept the whole religious status of cows thing.

                    Might look differently in other parts of the world but generally speaking pastoralism is way older than agriculture and with it millstones, much less electricity to make the whole process worth doing for anyone but kings out to impress people.