• @OccamsTeapot
    link
    37 months ago

    Yeah but that’s why these people are professionals. Of course it’s complicated to do this but statisticians do it all the time. If there’s a known confounding factor (e.g. young people don’t answer calls) then it can be adjusted for. I know polling isn’t perfect but I find these points are less “I have a technical point about the problems with extrapolation/interpolation” and more “This poll doesn’t show what I want so there must be a problem”

    • @whotookkarl
      link
      17 months ago

      I think it is telling how difficult it can be to accurately predict based on polls and all other available data by how rare it is for a professional analyst to make an accurate prediction on something like a federal election 12 or 8 months away.

      • @OccamsTeapot
        link
        37 months ago

        Really? What about 2020

        Almost all correctly predicted a Biden win. We don’t need the precise number just the general lay of the land

        • @whotookkarl
          link
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          There were plenty of predictions that got the winner right, but the amount that accurately predicted the ~51/47 are much fewer and I believe the rarity is an indicator that accurate prediction is not as clear and straight forward as some may expect even with statistical training.

          • @OccamsTeapot
            link
            17 months ago

            For me it’s not so much about the specific number and more “Who will win” and it definitely seems like polls do that quite well, even 8 months out etc as you mentioned before.

            I think expecting precise accuracy is quite a high bar. The only real test is the election if that is your stance, and by then it’s too late to do anything about it