• Queue
    link
    fedilink
    258 months ago

    I never understand why in 2024 you’d buy nvidia, unless you like paying more for less, or buying from scalpers for even more money. I guess some people really just go “More money spent on it, more better” no matter what.

    • @finkrat
      link
      288 months ago

      People just think “gaming?? OH NO I NEED MY NVIDIA!!!” while AMD is sitting there like “hey. Hey I have a card that’ll work. Hey. Card. Right here. Works better in Linux. Less headaches. Hello. Hey person. Card. Hi.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        68 months ago

        Only if you consider ray tracing to be a gimmik (which it is) then AMD is the obvious way to go.

        In reality It’s because people bought their laptops and their Desktops before switching and want to Use their already existing graphic cards.

        • @finkrat
          link
          38 months ago

          This is a very good point, I forgot gaming laptops are almost exclusively nvidia

    • @Bye
      link
      238 months ago

      Need cuda.

    • Björn Tantau
      link
      fedilink
      138 months ago

      A 1070 is hardly a card anyone would buy in 2024. Maybe they were running Windows before that and didn’t care that much.

      Also, hard to believe, but for a long while nVidia actually gave you the better experience on Linux. Before AMD had bought ATI. And probably a good while after the sale. The ATI drivers sucked ass.

    • Eager Eagle
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’d like to buy AMD, but I have all these use cases

      • HDMI 2.1 (4K @ 120Hz) - relevant after recent news, if planning to use open source drivers
      • CUDA + Machine Learning applications
      • DLSS still visually better than FSR
      • Ray Tracing still better on GeForce cards
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        CUDA + Machine Learning applications

        AMD has HIP or Rocm, which unlike CUDA is free software. Any program that uses proprietary CUDA libraries is proprietary.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Well yes and no. There is proprietary software that uses CUDA but there also is other AI software that optionally uses CUDA. Usually there is a free software built version

      • NekuSoul
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I think the first one can be circumvented by just using a DP->HDMI adapter. But yeah, those other points are why I’m a bit hesitant about swapping to AMD myself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      Because the features are better. That’s why most FPS comparisons of AMD and Nvidia always turn off the ray tracing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      NVIDIA still have the best performing cards if you care about ray tracing. I honestly think that’s the only reason to consider buying NVIDIA but you pay a heck of a premium for that.

    • @rtxnM
      link
      English
      28 months ago

      Blender Cycles on Linux does not work with an AMD GPU. Updating either the kernel or ROCm has a 50-50 chance of completely breaking Cycles. By comparison, I had zero issues with Cycles, either CUDA or OptiX, on my 2060. OptiX is also a better denoiser that runs on the GPU, while AMD only has OpenImage that runs on the CPU (GPU support is questionable at this point).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        Updating either the kernel or ROCm has a 50-50 chance of completely breaking Cycles

        That sucks, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t work. I’m on Debian stable and it works fine for me, except for weird crashes from time to time.