• @fidodo
    link
    English
    789 months ago

    They’re technically not banning tiktok, they’re banning China from owning tiktok

    • @bouh
      link
      209 months ago

      Which is somehow even worse : it’s like only the USA is allowed to spy on everyone!

      • @duffman
        link
        119 months ago

        They can still spy, but why would we make it easier for them?

        • @bouh
          link
          69 months ago

          So you don’t ridiculise your country by promoting freedom of trade but seizing the assets of the countries you don’t like when it’s a better tech than yours.

            • @Fedizen
              link
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              our most and least popular politician is a sex predator who earned all his money by his dad dying and is currently at risk of losing his money because he can’t stop lying about things.

              The greatest monument to american shamelessness is Donald J Trump.

          • @duffman
            link
            29 months ago

            I’m not with my government on a lot of things they do. I want the same data rights and restrictions to apply to all companies that host people’s personal information.

            But what’s this about Impressive tech? Tiktoc? First that’s laughable, even more laughable is how you phrase is as if anyone would give a fuck if another country had some better tech. Sounds like you are projecting your own insecurities.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          59 months ago

          It will be just as easy for them, just less profitable. Now they’ll just pay Zuckerberg or Musk for the information. If they aren’t already.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        And it’s not like they can’t maintain use of the thing while not being owners. Come on. Like there’s some magic rule if a company’s not owned by China, it can’t be used as a Chinese intelligence source? Come on.

        If social media is in cahoots with foreign intelligence, there are better ways to handle it in my opinion.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          39 months ago

          The fact that China is using disinformation to stop the forced sale of TikTok is pretty telling that they will be negatively impacted by this.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      169 months ago

      They’re functionally forcing the sale of the company to a US Firm at fire sale prices.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        Yeah, you are right. They should do like they do in China, sell to a JV with a local company at fire sales price… Oh wait

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          -19 months ago

          sell to a JV with a local company at fire sales price

          The Chinese policy is to share ownership with locals, so that a firm isn’t simply extracting wealth from the Chinese market.

          The American policy is to seize a pre-existing firm after it has developed, by accusing its Singapore founder of being a secret Chinese Communist.

    • @Filthmontane
      link
      89 months ago

      This is primarily intended as a hostile buyout of tiktok. It has literally nothing to do with China.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Lmao, the USA doesn’t operate the commercial sector outside of power, trains, rockets, and planes. It won’t benefit from the sale in any way other than lowering Chinese involvement.

        • @Filthmontane
          link
          49 months ago

          The US government works for the billionaires that run the economy. Many billionaires want to buy tiktok. In fact, there’s already teams of people set up for buying out tiktok. The government is just the tool for the hostile acquisition. No one said the US government is directly purchasing tiktok.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -39 months ago

            The US Government and Billionaires are opposing forces, one political party wants to tax billionaires while the other is on the payroll.

            • @tbs9000
              link
              29 months ago

              They’re not at all opposing forces. Some billionaires are in competition with each other and political parties are tools at certain billionaires disposal.

              The act of taxing income is but one political mechanism used to influence the power of some billionaires over another.

                • @tbs9000
                  link
                  19 months ago

                  I’m not sure I understand your question. They are both pro-government. If any one human could be the personification of government, it would be the President of the United States.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    19 months ago

                    So every billionaire is pro-government, and against taxation, but also pro-taxation to hurt the other billionaires (each other) but also the political party with a platform of “Tax the Rich” is in no way actually opposed to the political party who literally cuts taxes for the rich?

                    You should see a doctor.

    • @finnie
      link
      -239 months ago

      They’re not going to sell though. The US only makes up a single-digit % of their users.

        • @finnie
          link
          -179 months ago

          Nothing I said is incorrect.

            • @finnie
              link
              -12
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              deleted by creator

            • @finnie
              link
              -239 months ago

              Then you have no point? They’re not going to sell their money machine because a tiny fraction of it went away.

            • @finnie
              link
              -259 months ago

              Then you agree that they’re not going to sell? What does being the largest single market have to do with this? Fucking make a point, dude.

              • @breadsmasher
                link
                English
                109 months ago

                Calm the fuck down dude, jesus christ. Go touch grass

                • @finnie
                  link
                  -249 months ago

                  Still not a point 👍

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    69 months ago

                    Build your own inferences off of what someone has said. Chasing them down for clarity or elaboration wastes words. Just fill in your best guess, mention it, and move on. They can correct if they suddenly care.

        • @finnie
          link
          -109 months ago

          Your source is fine 👍

          Yours says that ~90% of their users are not from the US.

          Despite the US being Tiktoks largest single-country user base they still only make up a sliver of their monthly-active users.

          • @LifeInMultipleChoice
            link
            49 months ago

            So just over 4% of the worlds population is making up 10% of the usage. I suppose the owners shouldn’t care about that sliver of the users. They should care more about the smaller slivers, got it.

            • @finnie
              link
              -69 months ago

              Tiktok is one of the largest social media apps on earth, they’re not selling it over a sliver. Why does it matter how much bigger the sliver is than the other ones? Are you stupid?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        “TikTok” is an American Company. Their owners, ByteDance, also own a nearly identical product in china called 抖音 (Douyin). The Chinese version is much more closely operated by the military, their offices are literally military owned buildings and lots.